SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 249

NISHITA MHATRE, TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY
Brajesh Jha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Ld. Advocate General, L. K. Gupta, Ld. Addl. A.G., Abhratosh Majumdar, Government Pleader, Partha Ghosh, Ajay Chaubey, Shamik Chatterjee, Hemraj Adhikari, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Ravi Sankar Chattopadhyay, Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Anindya Sundar Das, S. Bagchi, S.S. Chattopadhyay, Santanu Majhi, Snigdha Saha, Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Subhobrata Dutta, T.M. Siddiqui, Somnath Naskar, Ujjal Kumar Roy, Pradip Kumar Das, Asraf Ali, Shankar Banerjee, Arunava Ghosh, Anindya Lahiri, Shamim Ahmed, Mainak Ganguly, Pranati Das, Jyoti Prakash Chatterjee, S.K. Kapur, Niladri Bhattacharjee, Gopal Halder, Uttiyo Mullick, Prithwish Kumar Basu, Soham Bandopadhyay, Kalyan Kumar Bandopadhyay, Jyoti Prakash Chatterjee, Pramiti Bandopahyay, Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Partha Sarathi Sengupta, Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Subhro Kanti Roy Chowdhury, Deborshi Dhar, Manisankar Chattopadhyay, Tarak Nath Sarkar, Kishore Dutta, Ratul Biswas, Dipayan Chowdhury, Suvradal Choudhury, Souma Bhattacharya, Priyanka Chowdhury, Srija Banerjee, Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Sourav Mondal, Dyutiman Banerjee, Pintu Karan, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Nishita Mhatre, J.

1. An extremely disturbing and alarming issue has arisen before us regarding alleged acts of corruption committed by persons who hold high public offices in the State of West Bengal. It is disquieting and deplorable to say the least. If the allegations are true such persons have no business to continue in the positions they hold today either as elected representatives of the people of West Bengal or as Ministers of the Government of West Bengal or in employment as a senior officer in the State’s Police force. If the accusations are false, it is worrisome that the reputation of these individuals has been sullied by a person who claims to be a journalist and has published audio-video footage depicting these alleged acts; and, by others, who claiming to be public spirited citizens have filed these public interest litigations on viewing that footage.

2. The Petitioners in WP 5243(W) of 2016 and WP 5175(W) of 2016 and the second Petitioner in WP 5224(W) of 2016 are all practicing advocates. The first Petitioner in WP 5224(W) of 2016 is a businessman and the General Secretary of the West Bengal Pradesh Congress Committee. As the issues involved in these petitio







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top