ARIJIT BANERJEE
Bimal Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent
ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.
1. In this writ application the petitioner challenges an order dated 15th December, 2012 passed by the AC (TTD), KMC. By the said order, the said officer of KMC directed that the petitioner’s application for mutation in respect of the premises No. 2 Choubhaga Road, Kolkata to be processed for joint mutation in the names of the petitioner and the private respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that the private respondents have no right, title or interest in respect of the said premises and the same should be mutated in the sole name of the petitioner.
2. The material facts of the case are briefly that the petitioner claims to be the owner of premises no. 2 Choubhaga Road, Kolkata having purchased the same in a court proceeding. The petitioner relies on extracts from the Assessment Registrar of Tollygunge Municipality in respect of his claim of ownership in respect of the said premises. The petitioner applied for mutation of the property in his name. In view of the inaction on the part of the KMC Authorities, the petitioner moved WP No. 2177 of 2003 in this Court which was disposed of by an order dated 25 November, 2003 by directing the Municipal C
ABL International Ltd. vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.
Dalip Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dipak Kumar Mukherjee vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation
Dilboo (Smt) (Dead) By Lrs vs. Dhanraji (Smt) (Dead)
Priyanka Estates International Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Assam
State of UP vs. Raja Ram Jaiswal
Swati Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.