NADIRA PATHERYA, SUBRATA TALUKDAR
Pushan Majumdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Patherya J.
1. This appeal has been filed from the order dated 17th August, 2010, by the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS) as it is neither a ‘State’ or ‘other Authority’ and the maintainability issue of the writ petition was considered and dismissed. Along with FMA No.16 of 2011, W.P.12697(W) of 2016 filed by Utpal Sadhu and W.P.28123(W) of 2012 filed by Ashoke Kumar Roy were also tagged.
2. Counsel for the appellant places the Memorandum of Association of IACS so also the Regulation of IACS before the Court. 1975 (1) SCC 421, 1979 (3) SCC 489, AIR 1989 SC 1607, 2002 (5) SCC 411 and 2005 (5) SCC 75 is relied in support of its contention.
3. On the contra Counsel for IACS relies on AIR 1981 SC 487, AIR 1992 SC 76, 1984 (2) SCC 14, AIR 1988 SC 469, 2001 (2) CHN 762 (FB) and 1992 (1) CLJ 319. 2013 (8) SCC 345 supports the contention of the writ petitioner/appellant. In W.P.12697(W) of 2016 the Constitution of IACS was annexed and in Regulation 7 of IACS, the formation of the Council, its Constitution and composition finds mention. Regulation 10 of the Association also deals with financial aid given to IACS by the Government of India. In this respect Regu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.