IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, Arijit Banerjee, JJ.
Rituparna Sarkar Dutta – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Respondents
WP 568 & 1130 of 2015
Decided On : 03-05-2018
Right to Assembly - Political Rallies and Processions - Art. 19(1)(b), Sec. 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Art. 51A - Summary of Acts and Sections: Art. 19(1)(b), Sec. 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Art. 51A - The court discussed the right to assembly guaranteed under Art. 19(1)(b) of the Constitution, the reasonable restrictions imposed under Sec. 144(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, and the fundamental duty of citizens to safeguard public property and abjure violence under Art. 51A. The court emphasized the need for a balance between the right to hold peaceful assembly and the right of the public to carry on with normal life and activities, and directed the State administration to ensure that criminal cases initiated against offenders are carried to their logical conclusion.
Fact of the Case:
The petitions concerned the permission granted for political rallies and processions, causing disruption to public life and essential services. The petitioners sought writs to prevent political parties from blocking roads and holding rallies during working days.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the fundamental right to hold peaceful assembly but emphasized the need for a balance with the right of the public to carry on with normal life. It directed the State administration to ensure that criminal cases initiated against offenders are carried to their logical conclusion.
Issues: The issues revolved around the disruption caused by political rallies and processions to public life and essential services, and the need to balance the right to assembly with the right of the public to carry on with normal life.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the right to assembly is guaranteed, it is not absolute and can be curtailed by reasonable restrictions in the interest of law and order and the general public. It emphasized the need for a balance between the fundamental right to hold peaceful assembly and the right of the public to carry on with normal life and activities.
Final Decision: The petitions were disposed of without any order as to costs. The court directed the State administration to ensure that criminal cases initiated against offenders are carried to their logical conclusion.
Arijit Banerjee, J.
1. In these two writ petitions, filed as Public Interest Litigations (in short ‘the PILs’), the subject matter and the prayers are similar. Hence, the two writ petitions are taken up for hearing and disposal together.
2. In WP No. 568 of 2015 the main prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities not to issue permission allowing any political party or any authority to block the roads or streets completely for any assembly or meeting or rally or procession. In WP No. 1130 of 2015, the main prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities not to allow the political parties/associations to hold political rallies during working days in the vicinity of the city of Calcutta since the same paralyses the free movement of public at large.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that rallies/meetings/processions are organized by political parties by completely blocking several important roads/streets thereby restricting the movement of the public at large. Blockage of arterial roads causes disruption of essential services like fire brigade, ambulance, etc. He submitted that the political parties are able to paralyse life in this manner because of the permission granted by the State authorities and/or inaction on their part to ensure that normal life of the public in general is not impeded by the political meetings/rallies/processions.
4. It was submitted that the right to free movement and the right to livelihood by doing business and attending work is a constitutional right of the citizens and the State authorities must protect such right. The State authorities are duty bound to ensure free movement of the public in and around the city of Calcutta during such meetings/rallies/processions.
5. Learned Counsel for the State respondents submitted that all necessary precautions are taken by the administration to ensure that normal lives of the people are not disrupted in any manner by the political meetings/rallies/processions. Learned Counsel placed before us two affidavits affirmed on behalf of the State. The first affidavit was affirmed by one Jayanta Kumar Halder describing himself as the Dy. Secretary. The said affidavit which was affirmed on 11 January, 2017 is not very relevant since the same deals with strikes/bandhs called by political parties. The other affidavit affirmed on 1 August, 2017 by one Anujit Biswas describing himself as the Dy. Superintendent of Police, West Bengal, gives some indication of the measures taken by the administration to ensure normalcy of public life on the days of political meetings/rallies/processions. In the said affidavit it is, inter alia, stated as follows:-
(i) On the days of political rallies/processions/meetings, the main object of the police administration is proper traffic management and crowd control to ensure that inconvenience to public is minimized and to ensure maintenance of peace and law and order.
(ii) Upon receiving advance information of political processions etc., elaborate police arrangement is made after taking into confidence all stake holders and after due consideration of inputs from the intelligence branch, giving priority to public safety and smooth flow of traffic.
(iii) To combat any untoward situation a good number of police personnel (including lady personnel) are deployed on the routes of rallies/processions/meetings or at and around the venue of the meeting under the supervision of senior officers of the Department.
(iv) In order to ensure minimum disruption to traffic the following steps are taken:-
(a) An elaborate plan is prepared regarding parking of vehicles carrying the supporters of the concerned political party as far as possible from the busy areas and the main roads so that they do not clog the main thoroughfares and disrupt movement of traffic.
(b) It is a fact that while the rally/procession is in progress some parts of the approaching
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.