SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
In Goods of Priyamvada Devi Birla (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Newar – Respondent
SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI, J.
1. Recording of the deposition of the first witness for the plaintiff, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Lodha, commenced on 28th November, 2018 and continued on the second day, i.e., 28.11.2018. Further examination-in-chief of the witness resumed again for the third day, i.e., 28.11.2018 and it was adjourned till 12th December, 2018. On 12th December, 2018, i.e., on the 4th day, when examination-in-chief resumed Mr. Ghosh asked a question to the witness being question no.80 - "do you know since when your father Rajendra Singh Lodha knew Mr. M.P. Birla?" When this question was raised, Mr. Kapur, learned Senior Advocate on behalf of the defendant nos. 1(b) and 1(c) raised an objection that the answer which had gone down with reference to question no.73, should not have been recorded by the Court inasmuch as the statement of the witness is a 'hearsay'. Mr. Anindya Kumar Mitra, learned Senior Advocate, raised his objection to the effect that such an objection raised by Mr. Kapur could not be entertained at a belated stage. The objection, which Mr. Kapur raised, ought to have been raised when answer to question no. 73 was given by the witness on 28.11.2018 but not on 12.
Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.
J.D. Jain Vs. The Management of State Bank of India and Anr.
Kalyan Kumar Gogoi Vs. Ashutosh Agnihotri and Anr.
Mukhtiar Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Musammat Atkia Begum Vs. Muhammad Ibrahim Rashid Nawsab
Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
Pratap Kumar Ganguly Vs. Anindita Ganguly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.