SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Cal) 716

SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
ITC Limited – Appellant
Versus
Special Director, Eastern Region, Enforcement Directorate – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ahin Choudhuri, Adv., S.N. Mukherjee, Adv., Samik Kanti Chakraborty, Adv., Dipendra Nath Chunder, Adv., Ranjan Roy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sahidullah Munshi, J.

In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged a Memo being No. T4/18-C/97-XX dated 3rd June, 1998 and lso another Memo being No.T4/XX/18-C/97/SCN/1258 (P), dated 6th July, 2016, issued by the Assistant Director for Special Directorate (E.R.), Directorate of Enforcement, whereby the petitioner was sought to be informed that final opportunity was being extended to him to take complete inspection of the relied upon documents once again on 11th July, 2016 at 11:30 a.m. before the Assistant Director (Adjudication). It was indicated in the said Memo that inspection would be a allowed to the persons who will be authorized by the Government. If the inspection process was not completed by the given date, the case would be decided ex parte on its merit as the matter was getting delayed for a long time. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by the reopening of an issue which was closed long back for no fault on the part of the petitioner. It is the contention of the petitioner that, although, the petitioner rendered all co-operation at all stages, but the
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top