SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 89

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
N.S.SANJAY GOWDA, D.M.VYAS
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Mangaji Thakor – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Chintan Dave, App

JUDGMENT :

N.S.SANJAY GOWDA, J.

1. Being aggrieved by an order of acquittal, the State is in appeal. The order of acquittal was passed on 3rd August 2024. However, the appeal against that order has been preferred only on 16th December 2025 i.e., after a delay of 313 days. Hence, an application for condoning the delay has been filed.

2. When considering the application for condonation of delay, we noticed certain requirements which are to be complied with in relation to offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the POCSO Act”) and which have not been complied with. This has therefore compelled us to pass an order detailing the procedure to be followed by the Trial Courts while rendering their judgments, both under the POCSO Act and also under the CrPC and BNSS.

3. The POCSO Act being a special enactment, adherence to the provisions of the said Act and the rules would be essential. We are also considering the provisions relating to the very same issue involved that is involved in this appeal, with reference to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.PC’) and the BNSS in the later part of this order.

4. At the outset, it must be stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top