SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
Haradhan Dutta - Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal & Anr. - Respondents
Cr A No. 672 of 2016
Decided On : 30-04-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Advocate, Apalak Basu, Advocate, Nazir Ahmed, Advocate, Swagata Das, Advocate, Nandini Chatterjee, Advocate, Jayashree Patra, Advocate, Chandrima Roy Karmakar, Advocate, Avik Ghatak, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code in the context of kidnapping and inducement of a minor, emphasizing the enticement and allurement of the victim, the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, and the belated plea taken up by the accused.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code - Kidnapping and Inducement - Sections 363, 366A - The court affirmed the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.09.2016 and 28.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T. Court No. II, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta, in Sessions Trial No. 2(4) 2013

Fact of the Case:

The case relates to the kidnapping and inducement of a minor girl, Rangila Khatoon, who was taken from Howrah Station to a red light area in Kolkata under false pretenses by the accused, Haradhan Dutta, who claimed to be a police officer. The victim was rescued by members of Durbar Mahila Samanay Committee and the accused was subsequently arrested.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, especially the victim, to be consistent and credible, affirming the charges of kidnapping and inducement against the accused. The belated plea taken up by the accused at the stage of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not considered credible and was used to support the prosecution's version of events.

Issues: The issues revolved around the kidnapping and inducement of the minor victim, the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, and the belated plea taken up by the accused at the stage of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the enticement and allurement of the minor victim by the accused, the knowledge and capacity of the minor to understand the consequences, and the place of occurrence from where the minor was recovered along with the accused. The court also highlighted the consistent and credible evidence of the victim, despite minor contradictions, and used the belated plea taken up by the accused to support the prosecution's version of events.

Final Decision: The judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.09.2016 and 28.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T. Court No. II, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta, in Sessions Trial No. 2(4) 2013 was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Tirthankar Ghosh, J. - The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.09.2016 and 28.09.2016 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T. Court No.II, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 2(4)2013 arising out of Sessions Case No. 05 of 2013 where the appellant was held guilty for commission of offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The learned Trial Court was thereafter pleased to sentence the accused as under :

    i. The convict Haradhan Dutta is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for five (5) years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 363 of I.P.C. i.d. to suffer R.I. for six months.

      ii. The convict Haradhan Dutta is also sentenced to suffer R.I. for seven (7) years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- i.d. to suffer R.I. for six months for the offence under Section 366A of I.P.C.

      3. The genesis of the case relates to a statement of the victim girl namely, Rangila Khatoon, recorded by Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Detective Department on 06.08.2012 pursuant to which Burtolla Police case No. 344/2012 dated 06.08.2012 was registered for investigation under Section 366A/372/511/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

      4. The statement of the victim which has been treated to be the First Information Report of the instant case is as follows:

        "My name is Rangila Khatoon. I am 14 years old. My residential address is, Village : Nohalberia, Post- Batul, P.S. Bagnan, District: Howrah. I have studied upto class V in Nohalberia School. My father Taj Mohammad and mother Sabana Begam live in Lucknow. My two younger brothers and a sister also live in Lucknow with father and mother since long. I visited there 2/3 times. My father works in a hotel there. I live with my grand mother Nurbanu Begum in our village. Our financial condition is not stable. As my grandmother was unable to afford my studies, I had to engage myself as a house maid (for washing utensils) for sometimes. Almost 15/20 days back as I rang my father, he told me to go to Lucknow to stay with them. Since our Eid festival is ensuing, so I was been to visit my father and mother. Today (6.8.12), in order to go to Lucknow, I set off from home, alone in the morning. The train was scheduled to depart in the night, still I left home well before. When I stepped down on platform no. 11 in the Howrah Station, a man approached me and asked my where abouts. I told him all. The man told me that I had enough time in hand, before the schedule departure of my train to Lucknow. He told me to accompany him to one of his friends house and after spending some time there, he himself would come to back with me to help me in boarding illegible train. The man introduced himself as a police personnel and that is why I trusted him. After that, he brought me to Kolkata at about 2.30 P.M. by availing the ferry service from Howrah. After reaching Kolkata he hired an autorickshaw and took me to a place which was very crowded and where I saw something like rail tracks (later came to road as tram car). He then told me that I am taking you to my friend's house, but on the way, you don't walk beside me and keep some distance. While we were approaching a narrow lane, I saw some well-dressed girls waiting there. When I asked him about the place, he told me nothing to be worried. But, I could realize that the place was not safe. The man had taken me there with an aim either to sell me or for any bad intention. I started shouting. The girls who were there caught hold of the man. Thereafter, many other girls came there. Police arrived. Rescued me. The police, in front of those girls, questioned me. I told them everything, the man, while we were travelling by Auto, told his name as Haradhan Dutta. I have told everything before the police so that the man gets punishment. After that police arrested that man (Haradhan Dutta) and left the place."

        5. The Investiga

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top