RAJESH BINDAL, ARIJIT BANERJEE
Humanity, Salt Lake – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
ORDER :
Rajesh Bindal, J.
1. The present petition was filed in public interest to challenge allotment of plot bearing no.IID/2920/1, New Town by West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (for short, ‘HIDCO’) totally in violation of rules, regulations and policies provided for allotment of plots. Allotment was made to respondent Nos. 9 and 10 vide letter dated September 27, 2013. The writ petition was filed in the year 2016 and is pending since then. When the matter was taken up for hearing, at the very outset, the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 9 and 10/the allottees and the Counsel appearing for HIDCO submitted that the respondent Nos. 9 and 10 having surrendered the plot and the amount deposited by them having been refunded, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. The prayers made therein have been rendered infructuous.
2. To this serious objection was raised by learned Counsel for the petitioners stating that there is no respect for law in the State of West Bengal. In the earlier round of litigation illegal allotment of plot was made to Sourav Ganguly, the respondent No. 9, the matter went up to Hon’ble the Supreme Court. Vide judgment
Akhil Bharatiya Upbhokta Congress Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Humanity and Another vs. State of West Bengal and Others
Joydeep Mukharjee Vs. State of West Bengal and others
Narendra Kumar v. Union of India
Ramana v. International Airports Authority of India
Sachidanand Pandey v. State of W.B. [(1987) 2 SCC 295]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.