SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY
Kamrul Huda – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgement and order of conviction passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 2nd Court, Islampur, Uttar Dinajpur in S.C Case No. 42 of 2013, S.T. Case No. 35 of 2013. By the impugned judgement learned Trial Court was pleased to record an order of conviction against the appellant for committing offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. and sentenced him to suffer simple imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 5000/- with a default clause.
2. Briefly stated, Khurshid Ali of Kishangunj set the criminal administration of justice into motion by informing the Officer-in-charge of Islampur Police Station, Uttar Dinajpur about the unnatural death of his daughter Jarina Khatun who was married to Md. Kamrul Huda. It was disclosed that at the time of marriage a sum of Rs. 10,000/-, ornaments made of gold and silver, utensils and furniture, wrist watch, bi-cycle etc. were presented. His daughter gave birth to two children. After marriage Jarina was subjected to physical and mental torture over the demand of money by her husband and parents-in-law. Jarina was put under pressure to fetch money from h
A.K. Devaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka reported in (2015) 1 SCC 752
Govind Ramji Jadav Vs. State Of Maharashtra reported in (1990) 4 SCC 718
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for convincing evidence to prove the offence under Section 498A of the IPC, emphasizing the need to establish cruelty likely to ....
Cruelty inflicted by a husband on his wife due to dowry demands, leading to her suicide within seven years of marriage, constitutes an offense under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code.
Conviction under Section 498A of IPC requires clear evidence of physical or mental cruelty, which was not established in this case.
The absence of evidence supporting a dowry demand negates the conviction under Section 498A unless proven that conduct resulted in cruelty independent of such demands.
Cruelty – No leniency is required to be shown towards accused in dowry offences.
The guilt under Section 498A IPC was established through consistent witness testimony despite minor contradictions, affirming the necessity for reliability in evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.