SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 371

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
T.S. Sivagnanam, Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.
Commissioner Of Cgst And Cx, Bolpur Commissionerate - Appellant
Versus
Shyam Steel Industries Limited - Respondent
IA NO. GA/01/2022 & CEXA NO. 16 of 2022
Decided On : 05-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Sr. Adv., Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. for the Appellant., for the Appellant; Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Dhanuka, Adv. for the Respondent., for the Respondent

The court established that the assessee was eligible to avail CENVAT Credit on imported coal, and the relevant notifications and rules did not restrict the availment of such credit.

Headnote:

CENVAT Credit - Eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit on imported coal - Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 35G - Notification No. 12/2012-cus dated 17.03.2012, Notification No. 12/2013-Cus dated 01.03.2013 - Rule 3(1)(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Rule 3(1)(vii) of the Rules

Fact of the Case:

The revenue appealed against the order disallowing CENVAT Credit and recovery of interest and penalty imposed on the assessee for contravening CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The tribunal allowed the appeal, leading to the revenue's present appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered whether the assessee is eligible to avail CENVAT Credit on imported coal and interpreted the relevant notifications and rules. The tribunal's decision was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.

Issues: Eligibility of the assessee to avail CENVAT Credit on imported coal, interpretation of Notification No. 12/2012-cus and Notification No. 12/2013-Cus, applicability of Rule 3(1)(i) and Rule 3(1)(vii) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there were no restrictions in the relevant notifications regarding the availment of CENVAT Credit on coal. It interpreted the rules and notifications to conclude that the credit of CVD is available and cannot be restricted by the excise duty rate. The court also referred to relevant decisions and circulars to support its interpretation.

Final Decision: The appeal failed, and the substantial questions of law were answered against the revenue.

JUDGMENT

T.S.Sivagnanam, J. - This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is directed against the final order No. 75858/2021 dated 21.12.2021 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax, Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, (tribunal) in Excise Appeal No. 79639 of 2018. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration:

    Whether the respondent is eligible to avail Cenvat Credit availed in respect of 1%/2% (concessional rate) Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) paid on imported coal in terms of Notification No. 12/2012-cus dated 17.03.2012 and 12/2013-Cus dated 01.03.2013, in view of restriction for availing Cenvat Credit in terms of the Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.03.2012 (sl. No. 67 and condition no. 25)?

    Whether the Learned Tribunal has misdirected itself by allowing the appeal of the respondent without appreciating that if no credit of excise duty at the concessional rate of 1% is available under the proviso to Rule 3(1)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the credit of CVD at the rate of 1%/2% is also be restricted?

    Whether the restricted as prescribed in respect of duty of excise in the Notification No. 1/2011 CE dated 01.03.2011 and in Notification No. 12/2012 CE dated 17.03.2012 read with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is applicable to the countervailing duty?

    2. We have heard Mr. Vipul Kundalia, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Mr. Tapan Bhanja, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rahul Dhanuka advocates for the respondent.

    3. The respondent assessee is engaged in the manufacture of Sponge Iron, Billet, TMT Bars and the principal inputs used in the manufacture of final products are Pig Iron, Sponge Iron and Scrap. The department conducted an audit for the period 2013-2014. Pursuant to such audit, show cause notice dated 03.03.2016 was issued proposing to reverse the CENVAT Credit and also impose penalty and levy interest. The allegation was that the assessee contravened the provisions of the Rule 2(a) and 2(k) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, read with Rule 3 and 4 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 by mis-declaring the goods as inputs and by deliberately suppressing the facts of taking the inadmissible input credit the intent to evade payment of duty.

    The assessee objected to the proposal made in the notice by submitting a reply which did not find favour with the adjudicating authority and accordingly the order came to be passed on 10.03.2017 disallowing the CENVAT Credit and order of recovery of the same in terms of the Rule 14 of the said Rules. Aggrieved by such order, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Appeal), Siliguri Commissioner (Appeals). The said appeal was partly allowed by order dated 18.06.2018. However, the reverse of the CENVAT Credit, recovery of interest and penalty was affirmed. Aggrieved by such order, the assessee preferred appeal before the learned Tribunal. The tribunal by the impugned order dated 21.12.2021 has allowed the appeal. Aggrieved by the same, the revenue has preferred the present appeal.

    4. The question which falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the assessee is eligible to avail CENVAT Credit availed in respect of 1 % or 2 % (concessional rate) Additional duty of Customs (CVD)paid on imported coal in terms of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17.03.2012 and Notification No. 12/2013-Cus. dated 01.03.2013 and as to whether there is any restriction for availing CENVAT Credit in terms of the said notification particularly as mentioned in Serial No. 67, Condition No. 25.

    5. The case of the revenue is that Rule 3(1)(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provides that a manufacture or producer of final products or a provider of taxable service shall be allowed to take credit (CENVAT Credit) of the duty of excise specified in the first schedule to the Excise Tariff Act leviable under the Excis

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top