ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
Metal Box India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jyotsana Poddar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Mukherjee, J. - The plaintiff is a company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 2013 with its registered office at New Delhi and an office at Kolkata but outside the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of this Court.
2. The defendant is the widow of one Vishwanath Poddar, a shareholder of the plaintiff-company. The defendant is a resident of 4B/S, Mayur Apartments, 3A, Loudon Street, Kolkata- 700017 within the Ordinary Original Civil jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The plaintiff-company was declared a sick company on 27th May, 1988 under the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the SICA) by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation (now ICICI Bank Limited) was appointed as the Operating Agency (OA) to prepare a Rehabilitation Scheme for revival of the plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of the SICA.
4. The said Vishwanath Poddar had filed a writ petition, being W.P. No.3569 of 1993 (Vishwanath Poddar vs. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction & Ors.) before this Hon'ble High Court which was disposed of by an order dated 5th
Madras Petrochem Ltd. and Anr. vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and Ors
Smt. Maya Basak vs. Smt. Kalidasi Dassi and another
Union of India vs. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association
The reduction of share capital in a company under a rehabilitation scheme is contingent and subject to modification until successful implementation. The repeal of SICA and the introduction of the Ins....
The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 prevails over prior agreements, enforcing conditions under Section 25F for retrenchment, thus nullifying conflicting claims based on earli....
Loss-making company can reduce share capital selectively, pay shareholders, and write off losses with shareholder approval; Tribunal's role supervisory.
The court retains discretion to refuse sanctioning a reconstruction scheme despite majority approval, particularly when misfeasance by directors and financial impracticality are evident.
NCLT approved 55.39% share capital reduction under S.66 Companies Act, confirming compliance with procedures, creditor protection, and no stakeholder prejudice.
On approval of a scheme by BIFR under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, unsecured creditors has option not to accept scaling down value of its dues and to wait till rehabilita....
Selective reduction of share capital under Section 66 permissible by extinguishing public shareholder holdings at fair value, justified for delisted illiquid shares and untraceable investors, without....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.