SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 869

RABINDRANATH SAMANTA
Sentu Alias Prasenjit Sannyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Prabir Majumder, for the Appellant; Mr. N. P. Agarwala, Ms. Subhasree Patel, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Krishnanagore, Nadia in Sessions Case No. 45(9) 2002.

2. By the judgment the appellant, Sentu alias Prasenjit Sannyal, was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-; in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months more.

3. To put briefly, the prosecution case may be stated as under:

4. On 17th November, 2000 the victim girl then aged about eight years, the daughter of the informant Gobinda Sarkar, went to the house of Subal Halder to listen 'Kirtan' song. At that time the appellant, Sentu alias Prasenjit Sannyal, came to the victim girl, who was then holding a three cell torch light in her hand. The appellant lifted her on his lap and brought her by the side of a bush situated on the carve of a road running by the side of the house of Sajal. After bringing her there, the appellant forcibly put off her pant and sexually ravished her against her will. After committing rape the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top