RABINDRANATH SAMANTA
Sentu Alias Prasenjit Sannyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Krishnanagore, Nadia in Sessions Case No. 45(9) 2002.
2. By the judgment the appellant, Sentu alias Prasenjit Sannyal, was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-; in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months more.
3. To put briefly, the prosecution case may be stated as under:
4. On 17th November, 2000 the victim girl then aged about eight years, the daughter of the informant Gobinda Sarkar, went to the house of Subal Halder to listen 'Kirtan' song. At that time the appellant, Sentu alias Prasenjit Sannyal, came to the victim girl, who was then holding a three cell torch light in her hand. The appellant lifted her on his lap and brought her by the side of a bush situated on the carve of a road running by the side of the house of Sajal. After bringing her there, the appellant forcibly put off her pant and sexually ravished her against her will. After committing rape the a
The reliability and trustworthiness of the victim's testimony, along with medical evidence, can establish guilt in cases of sexual offenses.
Victim's testimony in sexual assault cases carries significant weight; corroboration is not necessary unless warranted by circumstances, reinforcing the need for sensitivity in judicial proceedings i....
The testimony of a victim of sexual assault is credible and does not require corroboration for conviction, emphasizing the need for sensitivity in evaluating such cases.
The court emphasized the admissibility of child testimony under IPC Section 376(2)(f), establishing that a minor's capability to understand questions affirms her testimony while reinforcing the credi....
It is unbelievable to say that a mother would put her daughter entire life at stake by involving her in a serious matter like rape.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecutrix's testimony to be reliable and corroborated by medical evidence or surrounding circumstances in cases of rap....
The conviction for kidnapping and rape was upheld based on the reliable testimony of the victim, who was underage, making consent irrelevant.
The testimony of a sexual assault victim is critical and can be relied upon without corroboration, emphasizing the need for sensitivity in judicial evaluations of such cases.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the immateriality of the minor victim's consent in a rape case and the lack of requirement for corroboration in cases of sexual assault when the....
The sole testimony of the prosecutrix can be a foundation of conviction if trustworthy, but in this case, the evidence was found to be insufficient to prove the charges.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.