SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 68

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Pintu Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, for the Appellants; Mr. S. Ghosh, Addl. PP, for the Respondents

Table of Content
1. factual basis of conviction established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's observations on testimony and evidence. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. appellant's arguments against conviction. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal by the convict is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 06.06.2019 delivered in Sessions Trial (T-1) 31 of 2015 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No.5, West Tripura, Agartala. The appellant has been convicted under Sections 376(2)(f) of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine the appellant shall also suffer further simple imprisonment for 2 (two) months.

2. Genesis of the prosecution is rooted in the complaint filed by one Anju Das (PW-4) disclosing that on 10.09.2012 the informant went out of her house for performing works under REGA leaving the victim alone in her house. Around 4 pm accused (Pintu Ghosh) allured the victim on the pretext of feeding chocolate, chips etc and took the victim to his house and committed rape upon the victim therein. On hearing alarm of the victim, Smt. Manti Ghosh (PW-5) wife of elder brother o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top