SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1124

KESANG DOMA BHUTIA
Ratan Dhar – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar Pal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mukteswar Maity, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kesang Doma Bhutia, J. - This Court has no determination to hear a revisional application of the year 2005, but for proper adjudication of the issue involved in C.O. No. 1366 of 2021, the revisional application no. C.O. 639 of 2005 need to be heard analogously with C.O. No. 1366 of 2021 as both the revisional application arises out of a decree of preemption passed in Misc. appeal 106 of 1993, by learned additional District Judge, Hooghly on 03.12.2003. Therefore, both the above C.Os are considered analogously.

2. Facts which is necessary for determination of the both the revisional applications, in gist is that present opposite parties anil Kumar Pal and Sunil Kumar Pal have filed preemption case under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reform act, 1955 being Misc. Case No. 20 of 1991 against the petitioner for preemption of 1 Katha, 15 Chattak and 15 Sqft. in the Court of the First Munsif at Seramore. The learned trial court was pleased to dismiss such preemption case on 13.09.1993.

3. Being aggrieved by such order of dismissal the preemptor anil Kumar Pal and Sunil Kumar Pal have preferred a Misc. appeal No.106 of 1993 before learned District Judge, Hooghly. The appeal was f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top