SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1160

ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Panchanan Sasmal – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Samrat Pal, Advocate, Bidyut Kumar Roy, Advocate, Pratick Bose, Advocate

JUDGMENT

ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J. - This criminal revision has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.3.2012 passed by learned additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 2nd Court, Haldia in Criminal appeal No. 734 of 2011, thereby dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and order dated 13.6.2011 passed by learned additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, in C.R. Case No. 146 of 2006 under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments act, where the petitioner was convicted for the offence under section 138 of The Negotiable Instrument act and was sentenced to simple imprisonment for one day till rising of the Court and to pay compensation of Rs.6,00000/- to the complainant.

2. The fact of the case leading to this criminal revision is that the Opposite Party no. 2 lodged a complaint against the petitioner alleging inter alia, that the petitioner as a partner of Prasenjit Hardware had taken a loan of Rs.6,15,676/- from him and the petitioner in discharge of such liability issued cheque bearing number 0018310 dated 19.2.2005 for Rs. 4,00000/-in favour of the complainant which was dishonoured on bei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top