SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, UDAY KUMAR, JJ.
Suvendu Adhikari And Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of West Bengal And Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A.(P) 301 Of 2023 (CAN No. 01 Of 2023)
Decided On : 15-06-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Soumya Majumder, Mr. Srijib Chakraborty, Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee, Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ms. Priyanka Tibrewal, Mr. Vikas Singh, Mr. Sayak Chakraborti, Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Suryaneel Das, Mr. Anindya Sundar Das, Mr. Chiranjit Pal, Mr. Arup Kr. Dasgupta, Mr. Chittaranjan Panda, Mr. Harishankar Chattopadhyay, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Mr. S.C. Prasad, Ms. P. Saha, Ms. Hasi Saha, Mr. Sukanta Ghosh.
For the State Election Commission : Mr. Jayanta Mitra, Mr. Kishore Datta, Ms. Sonal Sinha, Ms. Sanjukta Samanta.
For the Union of India : Mr. Ashoke Kumar Chakraborti, Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharya, Mr. Ayanabha Raba.
For the State : Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Mr. Anirban Ray, Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag.
For the Intervenors : Mr. Ritzu Ghosal, Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Mr. Malay Bhattacharjee, Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mandal, Mr. Rajit Lal Maitra, Syed Chandan Hossain, Ms. Saloni Bhattacharya, Ms. Gulsanwara Parvin, Mr. Kaustav Bagchi, Ms. Priti Kar, Mr. Sabyasachi Chattopadhyay, Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta, Mr. Arka Nandi.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – To direct the State Election Commission to immediately file a report marking the areas which are sensitive after considering the Election Commission of India Report earmarking sensitive areas during the 2021 Assembly Elections as well as the NHRC and a special committee report filed pursuant to directions issued in the post-poll violence -Held, Court is well justified in entertaining public interest litigation and considering matter in a wholesome perspective - So far as decision is concerned same would be inapplicable of case - It was a writ petition challenging validity of an acquisition of said petitioner’s property by State of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - In case an allegation was made that application made by State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) is nothing but a profiteering venture of Government - no appreciable steps have been taken ever since the order was passed in the earlier writ petitions and till date no effective steps have been taken to identify sensitive areas from law and order point of view and in the light of the submission on behalf of the commission that it may take a couple of more days to do so, we are of the view that waiting any longer will cause more damage to the situation and will not aid in protecting the purity of the election process- Writ Petition is disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

(T.S. Sivagnanam, Uday Kumar, JJ.)

1. This public interest writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the State Election Commission to immediately file a report marking the areas which are sensitive after considering the Election Commission of India Report earmarking sensitive areas during the 2021 Assembly Elections as well as the NHRC and a special committee report filed pursuant to directions issued in the post-poll violence case in WPA (P) No. 142 of 2021 and 144 of 2021 and immediately requisition and deploy Central Paramilitary Forces in such areas and also at the areas where the state security assessment report denotes to have inadequate force to provide security till after the declaration of the results; to direct the State Election Commission to allow filing of nomination by the candidates contesting in Gram Panchayat Samity and Zilla Parishad who were prevented from filing their nominations in the respective officers of the SDOs; to direct the State Election Commission to ensure that all police personnel have to present their Government issued photo identity card along with Badge Number, tag and Aadhar Card and also other State Government Officials while discharging election related duties.

2. The present writ petitioner had filed an earlier writ petition in WPA (P) 287of 2023 which was heard along with WPA (P) 250 of 2023 and WPA (P) 286 of 2023 and by common judgment dated 13.06.2023 the writ petitions were disposed of.

Since, the main issued highlighted in the present writ petition concerns deployment of the Central Para-military Forces, we would refer to the relevant paragraphs of the common judgment in WPA (P) 250 of 2023 etc. dated 13.06.2023 which is as follows:

50. The next issue is regarding deployment of central para military forces. It has been stated by the State Election Commission that a meeting on assessment of deployment of forces was taken by the Commission on 09.06.2023 with the Chief Secretary of the state and the Director General of Police and an assessment plan by the State will be submitted in due course which will be reviewed by the Commission for taking appropriate decision. The petitioner’s contention is that to instill confidence in the electorate and to ensure fair and transparent election without any violence taking place can be achieved only by deployment of central para military forces. The petitioner in WPA (P) 287 of 2023 would state that prior to the election to the Kolkata Municipal Corporation during 2021 and the Municipal Election conducted in 2022 the State has witnessed large scale violence which has resulted in various deaths as well. In this regard, the petitioner has relied upon the various press reports which were reported in leading Dailies during February 2022 highlighting the violence which has occurred during the said elections. It is pointed out that the State Election Commission during the elections for the Kolkata Municipal Corporation declared 1339 polling centers to be sensitive out of the total polling centers of 4949. Reference was also made to the judgment of five judges bench of this court in WPA (P) No. 142 of 2021 etc, batch dated 19.08.2021 which dealt with the post-poll violence after the assembly elections in the state in the year 2021. After taking note of the all the facts and circumstances the larger bench referred the matter to the CBI for investigation wherever allegations are about murder of a person and crime against women and various directions were issued. The petitioner had also referred to the various orders passed by this Court from August 2022 till May 2023 where the court had directed the central agencies to investigate into the acts of communal violence, explosions bomb blasts and violence during religious festivals and as many as ten such orders were referred to. The decision of the Division Bench in WPA 272 of 2021 dated 10.02.2022 was also referred to which concerned the municipal elections wherein t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top