IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, JJ.
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Soumen Nandy & Others – Respondents
MAT 909 of 2023 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2023
Decided On : 15-06-2023
Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 66(2) - Whether Single Judge had jurisdiction to direct Central Bureau of Investigation to carry on investigation in the municipality recruitment scam - Held, Writ petition was filed disclosing illegalities perpetrated in selection of teachers and in course of investigation directed to be continued by Hon’ble Supreme Court a money trail was noticed involving a company which was awarded a contract pertaining to various municipalities and School Councils for printing of question papers printing of OMR sheets - In present case subject matter is a scam of extraordinary dimension and money trail and exchange of monetary considerations for giving appointments have extended to selection process of education as well as municipality - Investigation cannot be scuttled on a purported plea that Court had no jurisdiction to direct CBI investigation in recruitment of municipality since it was having determination over Group-II matters - Petition Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1. A legal tussle has spiraled up to this Court seeking a quietus to the primary issue as to whether the learned Single Judge had the jurisdiction to direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short, CBI) to carry on investigation in the municipality recruitment scam while considering an application being CAN 2 of 2023 filed by the Enforcement Directorate (in short, ED) in connection with a writ petition preferred alleging illegalities perpetrated in a selection process conducted for appointment to the posts of teachers in primary schools and in which the Department of Urban Development and Municipal Affairs was not even arrayed as a party respondent.
2. The case has a chequered history. The writ petition being W.P.A. 9979 of 2022 was affirmed in the month of June, 2022 alleging inter alia that many candidates who did not even pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (in short, TET) were appointed as assistant teachers in several primary schools. By an order dated 13th June, 2022, the Writ Court directed CBI investigation. In an appeal preferred against the said order, the Hon’ble Division Bench delivered a judgment on 2nd September, 2022 observing inter alia that the forensic investigation directed to be handled by the CBI deserves no interference and that the Hon’ble Single Bench shall also be entitled to monitor investigation into any money trail, as considered necessary. Challenging the said judgment dated 2nd September, 2022, a Special Leave Petition (in short, SLP) was filed which was heard along with other similar matters and an order was passed on 18th October, 2022 directing inter alia that CBI shall continue their investigation as directed by the learned Single Judge and file a comprehensive report before the Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, however, stayed the order passed by the learned Single Judge directing cancellation of appointment of 269 candidates and the order directing removal of one Dr. Manik Bhattacharya, the President of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education (in short, the Board). Thereafter, the CBI investigation has continued. In the midst thereof, ED filed an application being CAN 2 of 2023 in the pending writ petition averring inter alia that during investigation in respect of primary teachers’ recruitment scam under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (in short, PMLA) searches were carried out at various premises and incriminating documents along with digital evidences were recovered from one Sri Ayan Sil and the said documents revealed that the scam is not limited to recruitment of teachers but also covered several other appointments made by various municipalities. Considering the said application the learned Single Judge passed the order dated 21st April, 2023 directing CBI to carry on investigation in the municipality recruitment scam and to file a report before the Court. Aggrieved by the said order the State of West Bengal preferred a SLP which was disposed of by an order dated 28th April, 2023 permitting the State of West Bengal to move a petition by way of review before the Hon’ble High Court. Pursuant to such direction a review application being RVW No.83 of 2023 was filed but the same was dismissed by a judgment dated 12th May, 2023 delivered by the learned Single Judge to whom the matter was assigned.
3. Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant, placing reliance upon a judgment delivered in the case of DSR Steel (Private) Limited –vs- State of Rajasthan and Others, reported in (2012) 6 SCC 782, submits that when an order under review is not interfered with and the review petition is dismissed no question of any merger arises and person aggrieved by the order impugned in review shall have to challenge the same and not the order dismissing the review petition. In the present case, the review petition has been dismissed affirming the order dated 21st April, 2023 and as such the appellant has challenged the
DSR Steel (Private) Limited –vs- State of Rajasthan and Others
Dwarka Prasad Agarwal (D) By Lrs. –vs- B.D. Agarwal and Others
Kunga Nima Lepcha and Others –vs- State of Sikkim and Others
Divine Retreat Centre –vs- State of Kerala and Others
State of West Bengal and Others –vs- Sampat Lal and Others
Arnab Ranjan Goswami –vs- Union of India and Others
Narmada Bai –vs- State of Gujarat and Others
State of Maharashtra –vs- Farook Mohammed Kasim Mapkar and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for sparing and cautious use of CBI investigations, especially when the matter can be handled at the state level, and the requirement for ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of procedural fairness and the principles of natural justice in administrative actions such as CBI investigations and termination of....
The court has the jurisdiction to entertain petitions with a public law element, and inadequate investigation justifies transfer to a central agency.
Point of Law : Sub-section (1) of Section (3) of Act makes it clear that appropriate Government is under a statutory obligation to appoint a Commission of Inquiry in a case where a resolution on that....
The registration of an FIR is obligatory if the information provided indicates a cognizable offence, as preliminary inquiries cannot delay the registration process, particularly in cases involving sy....
The Writ Petition for investigation was dismissed due to non-exhaustion of prior remedies and lack of substantiated allegations of corruption.
FIR – Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of Cr.P.C. if information discloses commission of a cognizable offence, and no preliminary enquiry is permissible in such a situation – Holdin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to direct investigation by the CBI in cases involving serious crimes, high profile officials, and political nature of the crime, ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.