State of West Bengal vs Soumen Nandy

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Cal) 441

AMRITA SINHA
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Soumen Nandy – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the State : Mr. S. N. Mookherjee, Ld. A.G., Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. G.P., Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag.
For the Respondents: Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv., Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas, Ms. Payel Shome, Mr. Sandip Kumar De, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar.
For the E.D. : Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Ld. DSG, Mr. Samrat Goswami.
For the CBI : Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. DSGI, Mr. Arijit Majumdar, Adv.,
For the DPSC, Hooghly : Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Mr. Biman Halder.
For the DPSC, Nadia : Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay.
For the WBBPE : Mr. L.K. Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Saikat Banerjee, Mr. Ratul Biswas, Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury.

JUDGMENT :

Amrita Sinha, J.

1. An application for review has been filed by the State of West Bengal through the Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Municipal Affairs seeking review of the order dated 21st April, 2023 passed by His Lordship the Hon’ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay in CAN 02 of 2023 preferred by the Directorate of Enforcement in WPA No. 9979 of 2022 (Soumen Nandy vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.).

2. The said review application has been filed pursuant to the leave granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 28th April, 2023 in petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 8706/2023 filed at the instance of the State of West Bengal challenging the order dated 21st April, 2023 passed in CAN No. 02 of 23 in WPA 9979 of 2022.

3. The order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court records the synopsis of the Special Leave Petition which reads as follows :

“9. That the impugned order records that none appears for the State despite notice, on contrary it is most respectfully submitted in the said application the applicant has not even arrayed Department of Urban Development and Municipal Affairs as a party, instead the applicant had randomly served Advocates associated with the L

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Cal) 441

AMRITA SINHAState of West Bengal – AppellantVersusSoumen Nandy – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

AMRITA SINHA
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Soumen Nandy – Respondent