SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY
Dipak Kumar Shaw – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SIDDHARTHA ROY CHOWDHURY, J.
1. This criminal appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by learned 9th Court of Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, 24-Parganas (South) in connection with the Complaint Case No. C 2532 of 2003, corresponding to TR No. 730 of 2003. By the impugned judgment learned Trial Court recorded an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the NI Act.
2. Mr. Shataroop Purkayastha, learned counsel for the appellant assailing the impugned judgment submits that learned Trial Court failed to appreciate the evidence on record in its proper perspective and the judgment is the outcome of absolute misreading of evidence. It is contended by Mr. Purkayastha that Sri Soumen De and Smt. Paramita De, took a sum of Rs. 8,60,000/- from the Appellant as loan. Soumen De issued a cheque vide No. 612517 dated 2nd January, 2003 drawn on State Bank of India, Esplanade Branch in discharge of their liability to repay the same. The cheque was presented to the State Bank of Hyderabad, Sarat Bose Road Branch which was returned dishonoured for insufficient fund. Statutory notice was given to the drawer of the cheque under Section 138 (b) of the NI Act, by the holder
P.J. Agro Tech Ltd. vs. Water Base Ltd. (2010) 12 SCC 146
Rohitbhaijivanlal Patel vs. State of Gujarat
Satyavir Singh vs. State of U.P. (2010) 3 SCC 174
State of A.P. vs. Thakkidiram Reddy and Others
Aparna A. Shah vs. Sheth Developers (P) Ltd. (2013) 8 SCC 71
Chandrappa and Others vs. State of Karnataka
Ghurey Lal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.