JUDGMENT :

Lapita Banerji, J.:

The appeal and the application arises out of an Order dated August 8, 2018, whereby, the Hon’ble Single Bench rejected the writ petitioner’s/appellant’s prayer of allowing him to join the respondent No.2/The University of Calcutta (for short “the University”) as the Deputy Registrar (BCW). The writ petitioner challenged the Order dated February 13, 2018, communicated vide Memo No.LO/DR/178/6260/2018 dated May 10, 2018 (for short, “the impugned Memo”), whereby, the service of the petitioner being a “probationer” was terminated on the ground of “suitability”. It was held by the impugned Memo dated February 13, 2018 that since the writ petitioner did not possess requisite experience, he was not a suitable candidate.

2. The admitted facts of the case are that pursuant to an advertisement published on the website vide advertisement No. EST/568/39A dated December 1, 2016, the writ petitioner applied for the post of Deputy Registrar at the University at Calcutta. The essential eligibility criteria for the post of Deputy Registrar (BWC) were as follows:

(i) U