SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 360

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Durjoy Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Debabrata Goswami – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mrinal Kanti Ghosh.

JUDGMENT :

AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J.

1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 19/12/2018 passed by the learned District Judge at Jalpaiguri in Misc. Case No. 40 of 2018 present misc. case has been preferred. By the impugned order learned District Judge at Jalpaiguri was pleased to reject the petitioners prayer for transfer of Title Suit No. 43 of 1994 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Jalpaiguri to the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Jalpaiguri.

2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner filed a suit for partition and for other consequential reliefs as plaintiff against Debesh Chandra Goswami and others before the learned Assistant District Judge at Jalpaiguri being partition suit No. 27 of 1994. The opposite party herein filed a suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction against the aforesaid Asutosh Goswami before the learned Civil Judge(Junior Division) at Jalpaiguri and it was registered as Title Suit No. 43 of 1994 (T.S. No. 2456 of 2014).

3. It is further submitted that in Partition Suit No. 113 of 2015 Durjoy Goswami, Sanjoy Goswami, Suranjoy Goswami are implead

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top