SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Jugal Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Nandan Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Heard Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the plaintiffs/ appellants.
2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 12.08.2016 (decree signed on 26.08.2016) passed by the learned District Judge-II, Chatra dismissing the Title Appeal No.51 of 2009 and confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.09.2009 (decree signed on 13.10.2009) passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-I, Chatra in Partition Suit No.09 of 1998, the plaintiffs/appellants have preferred this second appeal.
3. Partition Suit No.09 of 1998 was instituted for partition of the lands mentioned in Schedule-C to the plaint, claiming 2/3rd share therein and accordingly, prayer was made for preliminary decree to be passed in favour of the plaintiffs by appointing a survey knowing Pleader Commissioner, a separate takhta of their share be carved out and possession of the same to be delivered to them with costs of the suit.
4. The case of the plaintiffs/appellants before the learned trial Court was as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.