RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Snigdha Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Kalyan Mukherjee @ Kalyan Kumar Mukherjee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.) :
1. The instant revision case is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.09.2020 passed by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Baruipur, South 24 parganas in Criminal Appeal No.8 of 2016. By dint of the same learned Trial Court has modified the order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the Ld. Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in M.P Case No.21 of 2012 and T.R Case No. 208 of 2012 to the effect that in place and stead of paying a sum of Rs.10,000/-as maintenance per month along with a further sum of Rs. 10,000/-p.m. as medical expenditure, the present opposite party would only require to pay the maintenance amount as directed and not the monthly medical expenditure.
2. Bereft of any unnecessary details the factual background necessary to be dealt with in this revision may be narrated that the petitioner is the wife of opposite party and they were married on 10.07.1985. Their marriage was registered as per provisions of Special Marriage Act, 1954. However the parties could not lead a peaceful conjugal life and the petitioner filed in the Trial Court her application/case under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.