IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.
Nurjahan Khatoon and others - Appellants
Versus
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited & Another - Respondents
FMA 891 OF 2022
Decided on : 18-11-2022
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Section 166 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the assessment of the quantum of income of the deceased-victim at the time of the accident, application of multiplier for calculating the compensation amount, deductions towards personal and living expenses, and additional amount towards future prospects. The court referred to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Syed Sadiq and Others v. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Mst Abeda Bibi & Ors, Sarla Verma and Others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another, National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Others, and Ramchandrappa v. Manager, Royal Sundram Allaince Company Limited.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased-victim was traveling in a truck and sustained grievous injuries leading to death. The claimants, being the wife and children of the deceased, filed an application claiming compensation. The tribunal granted compensation in favor of the claimants, which led to the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the assessment of the quantum of income of the deceased-victim was the central issue in the appeal. It discussed the evidence presented by the claimants and the insurance company, and made determinations regarding the calculation of the compensation amount.
Issues: The main issue was the assessment of the deceased-victim's income at the time of the accident, and the subsequent calculation of the compensation amount.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence presented, the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and various decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to determine the appropriate income assessment and calculation of the compensation amount.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed against the insurance company, and the impugned judgment and award of the tribunal were modified. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the balance amount of compensation and made provisions for the distribution of the compensation to the claimants.
JUDGMENT :
Bivas Pattanayak, J.
1.The present appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 11 February 2021 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track, 1st Court cum Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Islampur, Uttar Dinajpur in M.A.C Case no. 69 of 2019 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 granting compensation in favour of the claimants to the tune of Rs.5,95,000/-alongwith interest.
2. The factual matrix of the case is that on 20 March 2019 at about 6 AM the deceased-victim was travelling in the offending vehicle bearing no.AS-01-GC/8844 (truck) as a Khalasi which was proceeding towards Islampur from Chakulia and when the offending vehicle(truck) reached near Bihar More, Goalpukur the driver who was driving the offending vehicle at a high speed and in negligent manner lost control over the vehicle and it capsized beside the road. As a result the deceased-victim (Khalasi) sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to death. On account of sudden demise of the deceased-victim in the said accident, the claimants being the wife and children of the deceased filed application claiming compensation of Rs.11,00,000/-alongwith interest.
3. The respondent no.1-insurance company contested the claim application before the learned tribunal. However respondent no.2-owner of the offending vehicle though filed written statement but subsequently did not contest the claim application before the learned tribunal and the claim application was disposed of exparte against him. By order dated 17.08.2022 the service of notice of appeal upon respondent no.2-owner of the offending vehicle has been dispensed with for the aforesaid reasons.
4. The claimants in order to prove their case examined two witnesses including claimant no.1, wife of the deceased and one other and also produced documentary evidence which are marked as Exhibit 1 to 11 respectively. The contesting opposite party no.2-insurance company (respondent no.1 herein) did not adduce any evidence.
5. Upon considering the materials on record as well as the oral and documentary evidence produced on behalf of the claimants, the learned tribunal granted compensation in favour of the claimants to the tune of Rs. 5,95,000/-alongwith interest.
6. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award the claimants have preferred the present appeal.
7. Mr Subir Banerjee, learned advocate for the appellants-claimants submitted that the present appeal has been preferred by the claimants on the sole ground that the learned tribunal failed to accept and consider the monthly income of the deceased-victim amounting to Rs. 8,000/-, which is evident from the salary certificate of the deceased-victim issued by his employer namely the owner of the offending truck and erred in holding that the claimants failed to prove the income of the deceased. Further relying on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in Syed Sadiq and Others versus Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited reported in (2014) 2 SCC 735 as well as decision of this court passed in Oriental Insurance Company Limited versus Mst Abeda Bibi & Ors reported in (2017) 6 WBLR (Cal) 69 he submitted that even in the absence of documentary evidence in support of income, the assertion of income of the victim made by the claimants is to be accepted and accordingly the income of the deceased is to be considered at Rs. 8,000/-per month for assessing just and fair compensation. In the light of his aforesaid submissions he prayed that the appeal be allowed and amount of compensation granted in favour of the claimants be enhanced.
8. In reply to the contentions raised on behalf of the appellants, Mr Soumalya Ganguli, learned advocate appearing for the respondent no.1-insurance company submitted that although salary certificate of the deceased-victim has been produced, marked as Exhibit 9,
National Insurance Company Limited versus Pranay Sethi and Others reported in 2017 ACJ 2700
Syed Sadiq and Others versus Divisional Manager
Sarla Verma and Others versus Delhi Transport Corporation and Another reported in 2009 ACJ 1298
The central legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of the deceased-victim's income and the calculation of the compensation amount under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
In absence of documentary proof, minimum wage notifications serve as a basis for income assessment in compensation claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on oral testimony to determine the deceased's income and the application of established legal principles to modify the compensation am....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, including the determination of the deceased's income and the grant of general da....
The main legal point established is the assessment of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, based on the victim's actual income, future prospect, and general damages.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.