IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Bishakha Sau & Ors. - Respondents
FMA No. 77 of 2023
Decided On : 15-05-2023
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Section 166 - [166] - The court discussed the determination of the income of the deceased and the grant of general damages under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It referred to the case law and a government notification to assess the income of the deceased and limited the general damages based on the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Fact of the Case:
The appeal was filed against the judgment and award granting compensation to the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The deceased sustained serious injuries in a road accident and subsequently died. The claimants, being the widow and minor children, sought compensation for the loss.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the income of the deceased was determined without sufficient basis and referred to case law and a government notification to assess the income. It also limited the general damages based on the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Issues: The issues raised in the appeal were the determination of the income of the deceased and the grant of general damages.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on case law and a government notification to assess the income of the deceased and limited the general damages based on the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Final Decision: The court modified the judgment and award of the learned Tribunal, assessed the compensation, and directed the Insurance Company to adjust the awarded sum and interest thereon. It also directed the respondents-claimants to deposit ad valorem court fees on the assessed compensation and disposed of the appeal with no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award dated 29th June, 2022 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-cum-Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, 4th Court, Paschim Medinipur in MAC case no.287 of 2020 granting compensation of Rs.22,54,500/- together with interest in favour of the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
2. The brief fact of the case is that on 14.06.2022 at about 06-30 a.m. while the victim was travelling as a Khalasi (Helper) in the offending vehicle bearing registration no.WB-33C/8749 (Tipper Truck) which was driven in a rash and negligent manner, dashed backside of a standing vehicle, as a result of which the victim sustained serious injuries on his head, chest and over his bodies. Immediately, he was shifted to Midnapur Medical College and Hospital where he was treated till 20.06.2020. Thereafter, he was shifted to Minimal Access Surgical Private Limited at Tamluk and for better treatment, he was shifted to N.R.S. Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata where he succumbed to his injuries and died on 24.06.2020. On account of sudden demise of the victim the claimants being the widow, minor sons and minor daughter of the deceased filed an application for compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
3. The claimants in order to establish their case examined two witnesses including the widow of the deceased and produced documents which have been marked as Exhibits 1 to 10, respectively.
4. The insurance Company did not adduce any evidence.
5. Upon considering the materials on record and evidence adduced on behalf of the claimants, the learned Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.22,54,500/- together with interest in favour of the claimants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
6. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award of the learned Tribunal, the claimants have preferred the present appeal.
7. Ms. Sucharita Paul, learned advocate for the appellant-insurance company submits that the learned Tribunal erred in determining the income of the deceased on the basis of oral evidence only and failed to consider that no cogent documentary evidence has been produced by the claimants in support of such oral evidence stating income of the deceased. She further submits that it is the specific case of the claimants that the deceased used to work as a Helper under one Apurba Mukherjee but the employer of the deceased has not been examined by the claimants to primarily establish the profession and income of the deceased. Therefore, the income of the deceased determined by the learned Tribunal is without any basis. Furthermore she submits that the learned Tribunal erred in granting spousal consortium and parental consortium of Rs.50,000/- each in favour of the widow and minor children of the deceased apart from Rs.70,000/- towards general damages.
8. In view of her above submissions, she prays for modification of the judgment and award.
9. Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharyya, learned advocate for the respondent nos. 1-4 (claimants), in reply, submits that the insurance company in cross-examination admitted the profession and income of the deceased as claimed by the claimants and, therefore, such income should be taken into consideration for determining the compensation. He further submits that in case of unorganized sector, it is not always possible to produce documents in support of income and therefore income needs to be assessed taking into consideration the profession of the deceased. To buttress his contention, his relies on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in Syed Sadiq and Others Versus Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited reported in (2014) 2 SCC 735. Further relying on a notification of the Government of West Bengal, Statistics, Investigation, Research & Publ
Syed Sadiq and Others Versus Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited
Ramachandrappa Versus Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurnace Co. Ltd.
National Insurance Company Limited Versus Pranay Sethi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, including the determination of the deceased's income and the grant of general da....
In the absence of definite proof of income, the social status and nature of work of the deceased should be considered for compensation assessment.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of the deceased-victim's income and the calculation of the compensation amount under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Compensation for death in a motor accident must consider the deceased's potential income and appropriate deductions based on dependents, rather than relying solely on minimum wage assessments.
In absence of documentary proof, minimum wage notifications serve as a basis for income assessment in compensation claims.
LMV licence suffices for transport vehicle under 7500kg GVW sans endorsement; self-employed carpenter notional income Rs.800/day on oral evidence; 1/4th personal expenses deduction (4 dependents); 10....
The court established that the contribution of a homemaker must be recognized in monetary terms for compensation calculations, emphasizing the importance of minimum wage standards in assessing loss o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.