MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Gatik Tea and Co. Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. The writ petitioners have challenged the conduct of the Bank of Baroda in handing over collateral securities to the private respondent no. 4 on a notice, which the writ petitioners say, was issued under section 91 of The Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973. The notice dated 11th November, 2022 was issued by the police authorities; the Investigating Officer, Bhaktinagar, Police Station, Siliguri who is the respondent no. 3 in the writ petition. The petitioners seek setting aside of this notice dated 11th November, 2022 and all steps in pursuance thereof.
2. According to learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners, the petitioners filed a police complaint on 16th February, 2022 for an investigation against the private respondent which led the police to file a charge-sheet under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioners also instituted a suit being CS No. 305 of 2022 before this Court claiming various reliefs against the private respondent. Counsel places the challenge on the Notice dated 11th November, 2022 which was apparently issued under section 91 of the Cr.P.C. to the Bank for release of collateral securiti
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar; (2011) 14 SCC 770
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.