SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAVITRI RATHO
Arman Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: None
For the Respondent: Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel

JUDGMENT

This Crl.MC has been filed with the following prayer:—

“It is therefore prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to admit this Crl. M.C. issue notice to the Opp. Party and after hearing the statement/observation made in the paragraph-2 of the impugned notice at Annexure-3 series showing the petitioners as convicts in the alleged offences may kindly be quashed and the condition imposed at serial Nos.2 & 5 of the said impugned notice may kindly be modified to such extent to which this Hon’ble Court to deem just and proper.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

Fact of the Case in Brief

2. Petitioner No.1 is the husband and other petitioners are the in-laws of the informant-Anjum Bibi. She had filed 1CC Case No. 114 of 2017 in the Court of the JMFC Chandikhole against the petitioners. Pursuant to direction of the learned JMFC, under Section 156 (3) of the Cr. P.C, Balichandrapur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017 under Section – 294/323/506/498-A/ 34 Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) read with Section – 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (in short “DP Act”), was registered against the petitioners which corresponds to G.R. case No 6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top