KRISHNA RAO
Amalgamated Fuels Limited – Appellant
Versus
Pradip Kumar Jain – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. The plaintiff has filed Civil Suit No. 173 of 2021 against the defendant for eviction, recovery of possession and for mesne profit. In the suit, the defendant has filed the present application being G.A No. 1 of 2022 for dismissal of the suit or in the alternative, the plaintiff of the suit be taken off the file.
2. The defendant has filed the present application on the following grounds:
b. The plaintiff has shown the value of the suit overvalued in order to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court by assessing the mesne profit @ Rs.200/- per sq.ft. which is absurd and imaginary.
3. Mr. Rupak Ghosh, learned Advocate representing the defendant submitted that the monthly rent of the suit schedule premises is Rs. 9,923/- per month and the Municipal Taxes payable by the defendant is Rs. 6,003/- thus the plaintiff cannot file the suit for eviction of the defendant before this Court.
4. Mr. Ghosh submitted that the plaintiff has assessed the mesne profit at the rate of Rs. 200/- per sq. ft. per month is absurd and imaginary
Smt. Nandita Bose vs. Ratanlal Nahata
Srihari Hanumandas Totala vs. Hemant Vithal Kamat & Ors.
Shakti Bhog Food Industries Limited vs. Central Bank of India & Anr.
Nusli Neville Wadia vs. Ivory Properties & Ors.
Alpana Gupta through Power of Attorney Holder vs. APG Towers Private Limited & Anr.
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. & Ors. vs. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express & Ors.
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Association Ltd. vs. M.V. Sea Success I & Anr.
Smt. Nandita Bose vs. Ratanlal Nahata
Appollo Zipper India Limited vs. W. Newman and Company Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.