Back
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT BANERJEE
Court on its own motion In re: Smuggling and illegal trading of endangered species of birds – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. IA no: CAN 1 of 2020 is an application made in this writ petition by one Rajyashree Mukherjee for being impleaded as a respondent.
2. We have heard learned advocate for the applicant. Since this writ petition has been initiated by the Court on its own motion, we do not formally add the applicant as a respondent. However, we record that in the course of hearing, the applicant shall be heard.
3. The application being IA no.: CAN 1 of 2020 is accordingly disposed of.
4. We record the submissions of Mr. Rana Mukherjee and Mr. Arijit Chakrabarti, learned advocates, that they propose to file intervention applications.
5. Taking cognizance of this suo motu writ petition, we have minuted an order dated 04/12/2020 making reference to the various provisons of law which are relevant as stated in the writ petition drafted and presented on behalf of the High Court. We had also then heard the submissions of learned advocate Mr. Saikat Banerjee. Resultantly, we had issued notice to the 13 authorities and institutions impleaded as respondents in the array of parties as enumerated in paragraph 11 of the writ petition, also noticing the appearance of Mr. Saikat Banerjee for the Registrar Ge
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
