IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
BIBHAS RANJAN DE, J.
Kailash Vijayvargiya and Anr. - Appellants
Versus
The State of West Bengal - Respondent
C.R.R. 1 of 2021 With CRR 2 of 2021 With IA No. CRAN 1 of 2021
Decided On : 22-08-2023
POLITICAL PROTEST - UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY - SECTION 144 OF CRPC - WEST BENGAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ORDER ACT, 1972 - PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY ACT, 1984 - FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSEMBLY - REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS - POLICE ACTION - EVIDENCE - IDENTIFICATION OF OFFENDERS - ABUSE OF PROCESS - QUASHING OF PROCEEDINGS:
Fact of the Case:
Political rally organized by Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) to hoist the BJP flag at 'Uttarkanya', the State Secretariat, turned violent when protesters clashed with the police. Police used water cannons, tear gas, and lathis to disperse the mob. Several people were injured, including one who died from gunshot wounds. Two FIRs were registered against 14 named persons and 3000 others, including the petitioners, under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1972, and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the police had failed to identify any specific individuals who had committed the offenses alleged in the FIRs. The court also found that the petitioners had not been specifically identified as having provoked the mob to violence. The court held that the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioners would be an abuse of process and quashed the proceedings.
Issues: 1. Whether the police had sufficient evidence to identify the petitioners as having committed the offenses alleged in the FIRs. 2. Whether the petitioners had been specifically identified as having provoked the mob to violence. 3. Whether the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioners would be an abuse of process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the police had failed to identify any specific individuals who had committed the offenses alleged in the FIRs. The court also found that the petitioners had not been specifically identified as having provoked the mob to violence. The court held that the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioners would be an abuse of process.
Final Decision: The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners.
JUDGMENT :
Bibhas Ranjan De, J.
1. The lis involved in the two Criminal Revision Applications. Both the cases qua revision applications are marginally same, therefore, they were being heard and disposed of by this common judgement.
CRR 1 of 2021
2. On 07.12.2020, Anirban Bhattacharya, Officer in-charge of New Jalpaiguri Police Station lodged a written complaint which was registered under FIR No. 1426 of 2020 under Sections 147,149,353,427 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 9 of the West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as WBMPO Act), read with Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as PDPP Act), Corresponding to GR Case no. 5320 of 2020, alleging inter alia, Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (hereinafter referred to as B.J.Y.M.) youth wing of Bharatiya Janata Party (hereinafter referred to as B.J.P.) tried to take control of ‘Uttarkanya’, the State Secretariat to forcibly hoist flag of BJP to propel the Government to meet their demands. ‘Uttarkanya’ being a high security zone and covered under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CrPC) (vide order dated 03.11.2020) with effect from 09.11.2020 to 07.01.2021 as ordered by Commissioner of Police, Siliguri Police Commissionerate (hereinafter referred to as S.P.C.) to avoid any form of physical confrontation with the workers of BJYM there was ample amount of preparation such as traffic barriers strengthened with iron rods and wooden frames to pacify the mob and not allowing cross of the said boundary. At about 11 a.m., the workers of BJYM started to assemble at Noukaghat More. At about 12.15. p.m., leaders of BJP started delivering speeches to the mob with the intention to provoke them so as to encourage them to resort to violence. At about 2.15.p.m., the mob proceeded towards Tinbatti More where they were restrained by Senior Police Personnel who requested them to go back. Under the instruction of senior leaders the mob turned unruly and a section of them started stone pelting and tried to break barricades. Police in retaliation used water cannons to disperse the mob. They got dispersed initially but came back again to attack the police who then charged the mob with tear gas shells and at around 3.45 p.m., the mob got dispersed. As a sequel, the complaint was lodged against 14 persons by name and 3000 others including the petitioners herein.
CRR 2 of 2021
3. On 07.12.2020, Pareek Barman, SI of Police, SPC lodged a written complaint which was registered under FIR No. 1425 of 2020 under Section 147, 148, 149, 427, 307, 353, 332, 333,435, of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 9 of the West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as WBMPO Act), read with Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as PDPP Act) read with Section 25 & 27 of the Arms Act. Corresponding to GR Case no. 5319 of 2020, alleging inter alia, and tried to take control of ‘Uttarkanya’, State Secretariat to forcibly hoist flag of BJP to propel the Government to meet their demands. ‘Uttarkanya’ being a high security zone and covered under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CrPC) (vide order dated 03.11.2020) with effect from 09.11.2020 to 07.1.2021 as ordered by Commissioner of Police, Siliguri Police Commissionerate to avoid any form of physical confrontation with the workers of BJYM there was ample amount of preparation such as traffic barriers strengthened with iron rods and wooden frames to pacify the mob and not allowing cross of the said boundary. At about 11 a.m., the workers of BJYM started to assemble at Noukaghat More. At about 12.15.p.m., leaders of BJP started delivering speeches to the mob with the intention to provoke them so as to encourage them to resort to violence. At about 2.15 p.m., the mob proceeded towards Murder More where they were restrained by Senior P
AI
The police must have sufficient evidence to identify individuals who have committed offenses before they can be charged. The continuation of proceedings against individuals without sufficient evidenc....
The Court's decision was based on the application of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to determine whether a prima facie case was made out against the Accused for the matter to p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.