IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
Ratnesh Verma – Petitioner
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. – Respondents
C.R.R. 1270 of 2021
Decided On : 28-07-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 120B, 409 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 13(2)/13(1)(a) – Criminal Conspiracy – Withdrawal of cases and appeals by Sessions Judges – Held, Moreover, DSPE Act with its amendments have been restructured for facilitating/enabling CBI to carry out investigations under P.C. Act and withdrawal notification is abrupt, devoid of any reasons and has effect of shielding corrupt Central Government Officials, thereby, deterring CBI officers to investigate offences in respect of officers falling within category of Section 8(2) of CVC Act, 2003 – However, there may be cases where exclusively officers belonging to State Government are involved, in such cases fact of case may demand consent under Section 6 of DSPE Act, but nature of allegations complained in present case, officers/accused who are involved and loss which has been sustained do not involve any interference with powers vested in State by Constitution – Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Tirthankar Ghosh, J.
1. This revisional application has been preferred challenging the proceedings relating to case No. R.C.0102020A0022 dated 27.11.2020 under Sections 120B/409 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 13(2)/13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘P.C. Act’ ) pending before the Learned Judge, Special (C.B.I.) Court, Asansol, Paschim Bardhaman.
2. The complaint in relation to the First Information Report is set out as follows:-
It is learnt that during departmental raids on 07.08.2020 at 1 No. Railway Siding of Pandaveswar area, 9.050 MT of stolen coal was recovered and seized. Seizure of stolen coal was made from several other Railway locations as well. It is learnt that this illegal activity is being run at Railway sidings by the criminals with active connivance of unknown Railway officials.
It is further learnt that as per the Standard Operating Procedure for Action Plan – Illegal Mining and coal theft dated 08.08.2020 of CIL, “the main role of all the raids and actions to be taken is of the Area Security Officer/Area Security In-Charge, Area Authorities under the respective Chief of Security, ECL and under Area General Managers.”
3. Information has also been received that Shri Amit Kumar Dhar (A-1), was the General Manager, Eastern Coalfield Limited (ECL) Kunustoria Area (presently General Manager, Pandaveswar Area), and Shri Dhananjay Rai (A- 4), ASI is the Area Security Inspector, Kunustoria, ECL. It is also learnt from the source that Shri Jayesh Chandra Rai (A-2), is the General Manager, Kajora Area and Shri Debashish Mukherjee (A-5), SSI, is the Security In- Charge, Kajora Area, ECL. Shri Tanmay Das (A-3) is the Chief of Security, ECL who is in overall charge to check and prevent illegal mining in ECL area. A large number of instances of illegal coal mining have been reported from their area with their active connivance.
4. Information has also revealed that Shri Anup Maji @ Lala (A-6) is one of the main organizers for most of the illegal mining at ECL area and transportation of illegal excavated/stolen coal. He is running the above activities in connivance with the aforesaid public servants and those public servants are allowing him to misappropriate the government property i.e. coal from the leasehold area of ECL.
5. From the above facts and circumstances, it appears that illegal coal mining in the ECL lease hold area is going on along with theft of coal from Railway sidings in an organized manner and above said officials of ECL, Security Officers of ECL & CISF in connivance with unknown officials of Railway and other public servants allowed Shri Anup Maji @ Lala (A-6) and other unknown private persons to misappropriate the nati
A.C. Sharma Vs. Delhi Administration
Bhavesh Jayanti Lakhani Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
M/S Fertico Marketing & Ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
Maheshwari Fish Seed Farm Vs. TN Electricity Board & Anr.
Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. The Principle Secretary & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights & Ors.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the CBI has the authority to investigate in Railway areas within a state, even after the withdrawal of consent by the State Government, ba....
CBI investigation – Govt. orders according general consent to exercise powers and jurisdiction under DSPE Act against private persons for alleged offences whether acting separately or in conjunction ....
The ACB in Rajasthan can investigate and file charges against Central Government employees for corruption if committed within state jurisdiction, despite CBI’s authority.
The general consent given by the State Government for investigation of offences punishable under a specific act holds good for authorizing the investigative agency to investigate subsequent amendment....
State consent under DSPE Act prior to FIR registration validates CBI investigation despite earlier preliminary verification; no quashing of proceedings post charge-sheet and cognizance absent miscarr....
Lack of sanction for prosecution is not always fatal to case of prosecution.
The state government is constitutionally empowered to grant or withdraw consent for the investigation of offences by the central investigative agency within its territory. The power to grant consent ....
The court clarified that the CBI had jurisdiction to investigate the case without specific consent under Section 6 of the DSPE Act and that the lack of specific consent did not result in a miscarriag....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.