SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1605

KRISHNA RAO
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Neo Built Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Aparna Banerjee.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sakya Sen, Mr. Supratim Laha, Mr. Sabyasachi Sen.

JUDGMENT :

(Krishna Rao, J.) :

1. The petitioner has filed the instant application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the award passed by the Arbitrators dt. 01.9.2015.

2. On 03.10.2008, the Chief Engineer, Metro Railway/Calcutta had published a tender notice with respect of execution of ROB and road approaches at Kharagpur in replacement of Manned Level Crossing at KM 118/ 4-5, KM 0/18 and 123/2-3 in Kharagpur -Bhadrak Section of South Eastern Railway.

3. The respondent had participated in the said tender and the said work was awarded in favour of the respondent. The petitioners vide letter dt. 05.02.2009 accepted the rate quoted by the respondent for an amount of Rs. 18,77,85,218.89/- against the estimated value of Rs. 17,99,99,99.40/-.

4. On 29.09.2009, an agreement was executed between the petitioner and the respondent being agreement no. MTP/Civil/887 and the time of completion of the said work was 24 months from the date of issue of the letter of the acceptance.

5. On 05.02.2009 a letter of acceptance was issued in favour of the respondent b

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top