PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shristi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prakash Shrivastava, J.
1. This intra-court appeal is at the instance of the respondents in the writ petition, challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29th of August, 2022 allowing W.P.A. No. 18494 of 2022 which was filed by the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein (writ petitioners).
2. The respondent Nos. 1 to 3 had filed the writ petition with the plea that they were earlier awarded the contract for the management of the Health Care Services at Plant Hospital of the appellant No. 1 located at Salboni. On the expiry of the term, the appellant No. 1 had published the fresh tender notice inviting bids from interested persons on 26th of April, 2022. The respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (writ petitioners) had participated and submitted their bid in the prescribed form. According to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3, bid was opened on 27th of May, 2022, thereafter on or about 1st of August, 2022 they were refunded the security amount and they came to know that their technical bid was rejected. On the inquiry the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 were informed that the communication was sent through e-mail on June 16, 2022 requiring some further documents from them. According to the respondent No
Silppi Constructions Contractors vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2020) 16 SCC 489
Sorath Builders vs. Shreejikrupa Buildcon Limited and Another reported in (2009) 11 SCC 9
W.B. State Electricity Board vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others reported in (2001) 2 SCC 451
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.