IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.B. PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, JJ.
Montecarlo Limited & 1 Others - Petitioners
Versus
Gujarat Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (G-RIDE) - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 6767 of 2021
Decided On : 22-07-2021
Companies Act, 1956 - Business of infrastructure - Company incorporate - Writ-applicant no.1 is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act company is engaged in the business of infrastructure, construction and development with operations diversified across highways railways buildings and factories mining energy infrastructure and water & irrigation verticals of the infrastructure sector - Writ-applicant is one of Directors of company
Finding of the Court : Strenuously urged before us by senior counsel appearing for the writ-applicant that the mistake committed by the writ-applicant could be termed as unintentional and if that be so then writ-applicant being lowest bidder should be considered for awarding the contract - Supreme Court in W.B. State Electricity Board vs. Patel Engineering - Mistakes/errors in question it is stated are unintentional and occurred due to fault of computer termed as a repetitive systematic computer typographical transmission failure - Difficult to accept this contention - Mistake may be unilateral or mutual but it is always unintentional - Intentional it ceases to be mistake - Here mistakes may be unintentional but it was not beyond the control of respondent to correct the same before submission of bid
Result: Order accordingly
JUDGMENT :
J.B. Pardiwala, J.
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, has prayed for the following reliefs :
B. That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondent of disqualifying the petitioner no.1 from the bidding process in relation to the Tender Notice No.RIDE/BRCL/EPC/2020-21/002 dated 16.01.2021 issued by the respondent for the “Gauge Conversion of Becharaji (63.83 KM) - Ranuj (101.983 KM) Section, Total length of 38.153 KM Metre Gauge to Broad Gauge with 25 KV AC Electrification in Ahmedabad Division of Western Railway” as being arbitrary, illegal and unjust;
C. that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction to the respondent to consider the bid submitted by the petitioner no.1 in relation to the Tender Notice No.RIDE/BRCL/EPC/2020-21/002 dated 16.01.2021 issued by the respondent for the “Gauge Conversion of Becharaji (63.83 KM) - Ranuj (101.983 KM) Section, Total length of 38.153 KM Metre Gauge to Broad Gauge with 25 KV AC Electrification in Ahmedabad Division of Western Railway”;
D. That pending the hearing and adjudication of the present petition, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to proceed further in relation to the Tender Notice No.RIDE/BRCL/EPC/2020-21/002 dated 16.01.2021 issued by the respondent for the “Gauge Conversion of Becharaji (63.83 KM) - Ranuj (101.983 KM) Section, Total length of 38.153 KM Metre Gauge to Broad Gauge with 25 KV AC Electrification in Ahmedabad Division of Western Railway”;
E. For Ex-parte interim and ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer (D) above;
F. For such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
2. The facts giving rise to this writ-application may be summarised as under :
3. The writ-applicant no.1 is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The company is engaged in the business of infrastructure, construction and development with operations diversified across the highways, railways, buildings and factories, mining, energy infrastructure and water & irrigation verticals of the infrastructure sector. The writ-applicant no.2 is one of the Directors of the company.
4. The respondent no.1 is a joint venture of the Government of Gujarat and the Ministry of Railways. The respondent no.2 is the company in whose favour the contract has been awarded.
5. It appears from the materials on record that the respondent no.1 issued a tender notice dated 16th January 2021, calling for the bids from the interested bidders for the “Gauge Conversion of Becharaji (63.83 KM) - Ranuj (101.983 KM) Section, total length of 38.153 KM Meter Gauge to Broad Gauge with 25 KV AC Electrification in the Ahmedabad Division of the Western Railway”. The timelines in relation to the bids, as prescribed by the respondent, were as under :
- Bid Due Date (Physical) – 09.03.2021 upto 1200 hours.
- Bid Opening Date (Technical) – 09.03.2021 upto 1230 hours.
6. The writ-applicant no.1 submitted its bid in the prescribed form on 6th March 2021 through the online portal, and on 9th March 2021 also through the physical mode. The writ-applicant no.1 submitted the following documents along with the bid :
ii. Bid Security in the form of Bank Guarantee.
iii. Letter comprising the Technical Bid.
iv. Details of the Bidder including MoA and AoA of the petitioner no.1 and copy of PAN Card.
v. Technical Capacity of the Bidder.
vi. Details of Eligible Projects.
vii. Mandatory Experience Certificate.
viii. Detail setting out the Financial Capacity of the Bidder.
ix. Statement of Legal Capacity.
x. Power of Attorney for signing the Bid.
xi. Undertaking to agree and abide by the Term
Poddar Steel Corporation vs. Ganesh Engineering Works and others
B.S.N. Joshi and Sons Ltd. vs. Nair Coal Services Ltd. and others
Om Prakash Sharma vs. Ramesh Chand Prashar and others
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India
G.J. Fernandez vs. State of Karnataka
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. International Airport Authority of India
M/s. Master Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson Pvt. Ltd.
Jagdish Mandal vs. State of Orissa
Reliance Airport Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Airports Authority of India
Tejas Construction and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Municipal Council, Sendhwa
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited vs. State of Karnataka
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation vs. Anoj Kumar Garwala
Central Coalfields Limited and another vs. SLL-SML (Joint Venture Consortium) and others
Raunaq International Ltd. vs. I.V.R. Construction Ltd.
Air India Limited vs. Cochin International Airport Ltd.
Caretel Infotech Limited vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Others
W.B. State Electricity Board vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and others
Bakshi Security and Personnel Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Devkishan Computed Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.