Back
ANIRUDDHA ROY
Abhishek Maddunay – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners were candidates for lower division clerk posts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioners pursued the matter through legal means. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's direction led to appointment letters being issued. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. respective duties of the educational authorities are discussed. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. arguments regarding the responsibilities of the authorities. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. legal principles concerning compensation for inaction discussed. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. implications of negligence by authorities established. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. court grants compensation reflective of the harm done. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 9. final order disposing of the petition and compensation details. (Para 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT
Facts
1. The first petitioner belongs to Other Backward Classes (for short, OBC-B) and the second petitioner belongs to Exempted Category (Unreserved) candidate.
2. The erstwhile Burdwan District Primary School Council (for short, the Primary School Council), at present Purba Burdwan issued an advertisement for the Post of Lower Division Clerk. One post was rese
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
