Back
M. V. MURALIDARAN
Imran Enterprise – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Heard Mr. Sarajit Sen, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent State and Mr. Tapas Kr. Mondal, learned counsel for the respondent Zilla Parishad.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioners the amount due under the final bills (Annexure-P/2) as prepared by the respondent authority with interest at the prevailing bank rate till the actual payment is made.
3. The case of the petitioners is that on 7.12.2009 two work orders, namely RIDF-XIII under Scheme 209-10 AWC under GP Bodhakhali Khatian No.369, land area 3 Satak under Block Namkhana, AWC No.11, S.L.No.13 two construction of ICD Centre at different location in different blocks of south 24-Parganas District under RIDF-XIII, Scheme 2009-10, AWC under G.P. Narayanpur, Mouza - Narayanpur, J.L.No.47, Dag No.02, Khatian No.02, land area 3 Satak under Block Namkhana were issued in favour of the petitioners. The petitioners have satisfactorily completed the works on 5.10.2010 and 15.10.2020respectively. On 15.10.2010, a joint measurement of the works were do
The contractor is entitled to 6% interest on delayed payments as per previous court judgments regarding contractor compensation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
