HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Archana Maji – Appellant
Versus
Bhim Prasad Manna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.
1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant nos.1(ka), 1(kha) and 1 (ga) and is directed against an order being No.9 dated July 5, 2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Tamluk, District-Purba Medinipur in OS No.11 of 2022.
2. By the order impugned, the application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, at the instance of the petitioners, stood rejected. By the later portion of the said order, the petition dated 1st August, 2022 filed by the plaintiff/opposite party herein stood allowed.
3. The opposite party herein instituted a Title Suit being No.2 of 2012 before the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court, Tamluk. The plaint of the said suit was returned to the plaintiff/opposite party herein with a direction to present the same to the court in which the suit should have been instituted within one month from the date of the Order No.180 dated May 30, 2022. Thereafter, the plaint of the instant suit being OS No.11 of 2022 was filed before the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court, Tamluk
ONGC Ltd. v. M/s. Modern Construction and Co. reported at AIR 2014 SC 83
Hanamanthappa and Another v. Chandrashekharappa and Others reported at (1997) 9 SCC 688
Ketan V. Parekh v. Special Director
Salem Advocate Bar Association
Nashik Municipal Corporation v. R.M. Bhandari and Another reported at (2016) 6 SCC 245
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.