SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 301

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.
Managing Committee of Kamala Girls High School & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 21004 of 2018 with WPA 7948 of 2019
Decided on : 23-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ekramul Bari, Adv., Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mandal, Adv., Sk. Imtiaz Uddin, Adv., Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharyya, Mr. Victor Chatterjee, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Saqib Siddiqui, Adv., Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Adv., Mr. Suman Dey, Adv., Mr. Sirsanya Bandyopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Subhendu Sen Gupta, Adv., Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya, Adv., Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay, Adv., Mr. Jayanta Narayan Mahanti, Adv., Ms. Kakali Dutta, Adv.

The court determined that a teacher's transfer based on claims of being a 'Victim of Crime' was invalid due to lack of corroborating evidence and the failure to meet statutory requirements under transfer rules.

Headnote:(A) West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015 - Recommendation for transfer - School Management's resistance on legal grounds objected on teacher's satisfactory service duration not fulfilled - Transfer based on teacher being 'Victim of Crime' lacks substantiation due to absence of formal complaints and insufficient evidence - Court concluded that transfer recommendation was unlawful and reversed decisions regarding transfer and appointment. (Paras 51-70)

(B) Maintainability - The Managing Committee of a school has locus standi to resist transfer recommendations if it adversely affects the school's administration, highlighted by their responsibility to uphold student interests. (Paras 24-30)

(C) Teacher's unauthorized absence from duty deemed unlawful and treated as absence without sanction of law; her return to Kankhuli Girls' High School ordered within seven working days. (Paras 69-70)

Table of Content
1. introduction of the cases (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. background of the teacher's employment and transfer history (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. formal requests for reliefs in the writ petitions (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. parties' arguments regarding maintainability (Para 21 , 22)
5. arguments regarding locus standi (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. court's observations on locus standi (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
7. conclusion on locus standi (Para 30 , 31)
8. arguments on merit regarding the teacher's transfer (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
9. court's analysis on transfer rules (Para 37 , 38)
10. arguments regarding procedural compliance for transfers (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
11. state counsel arguments supporting the teacher's transfer (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
12. findings on the teacher's application for transfer (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
13. analysis of the transfer recommendation's validity (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66)
14. judgment outcome and directives (Para 67 , 68)
15. final orders and implications (Para 69 , 70 , 71)

JUDGMENT :

ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.:

1. Two writ petitions.

2. WPA 21004 of 2018 (for short, School’s writ petition) was filed by the Managing Committee of Kamala Girls High School (for short, Kamala Girls) challenging the recommendation for transfer of the respondent no.12 therein, namely, Smt. Madhumita Roy (for short, the teacher) dated January 11, 2017 issued by the respondent no.11 (for short, the School Service Commission), Annexure P-1 at page 51 to the school’s writ petition and the order/direction dated June 26, 2018 passed by the respondent no.8 (for short, the Board) directing to give effect the said transfer, Annexure P-11 at page 116 to the school’s writ petition and the impugned communication dated April 21, 2017.

3. WPA 7948 of 2019 is the writ petition filed by the said teacher (for short, teacher’s writ petition) for implementation of the said transfer order dated June 26, 2018 whereunder the teacher was recommended for transfer and was transferred to Kamala Girls High School.

4. Since the issues both on facts and law are interconnected and the subject school is the same in both the said two writ petitions, the parties agreed to proceed principally in WPA 21004 of 2018 and on the basis of the records therein. However, the parties have also referred to the records from WPA 7948 of 2019 wherever it was necessary. The parties, therefore, have agreed that both these writ petitions can be taken up together for final consideration by a composite judgment.

5. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to dispose of both the said writ petitions through this composite judgment.

Facts:

6. The teacher was selected for the post of Headmistress under the relevant Regional Level Selection Test conducted by the School Service Commission in 2009.

7. On April 9, 2010 the teacher was recommended by the West Bengal Regional School Service Commission (for short, the Regional School Service Commission) for appointment as Headmistress at one Sahachari Behari Vidyapith (Higher Secondary) (for short, Sahachari). She joined the said school on May 1, 2010 as Headmistress. Her employment was approved by the Jurisdictional District Inspector of Schools (for short, Jurisdictional D.I.) on August 25, 2010.

8. On April 5, 2013 the teacher while on her way to school alleged to have been physically assaulted by a group of people in order to spoil a Managing Committee meeting scheduled to be held on that day. On being so informed, the local police authority rescued her and she was medically treated. On April 4, 2013 the petitioner submitted an application for transfer before the Secretary, School Education Department as she had allegedly a life threat according to her. On April 17, 2013 the Commissioner, School Education Department issued the direction upon the petitioner to attend the Office of the Jurisdictional D.I. temporarily and to record her appearance w.e.f. April 18,

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top