SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 2008

2025 BHC(AS) 49260
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
The Maharashtra Rajya Padvidhar Prathamik Shikshak Va Kendrapramukh Sabha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 5456, 5759, 6028, 6213, 7548, 7552, 8239, 8753, 8754, 8946, 9276, 9977, 10213, 10321, 10432, 10433, 10470, 10497 of 2025, Writ Petition (Stamp) Nos. 13145, 15761, 15782, 16603, 24468 of 2025, Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 17362 of 2025
Decided On : 14-11-2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. S. S. Pakale, Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam, Mr. Girish Godbole
For the Respondents: Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis

The G.R. on teacher transfers aligns with the RTE Act by maintaining Pupil-Teacher ratios and does not violate statutory rights of teachers.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - The challenge is to the G.R. dated 15th March 2024 regarding transfer and posting of teachers; The petitioners claimed violation of statutory rights and argued against the delegation of vital functions to a private company. The Court ruled that the G.R. does not contravene the RTE Act and maintained administrative discretion in staffing norms as per the school demographic needs. (Paras 1, 5, 18, 19)

(B) Transfer of Teachers - The court addressed the control of local authorities over educational staffing and reinforced the prescription of maintaining a Pupil-Teacher Ratio as per RTE provisions. (Paras 24, 30)

(C) Humanitarian Approach in Transfers - The court emphasized the importance of a balanced approach in enforcing transfer policies with respect to teachers' personal circumstances. (Paras 11, 33)

Facts of the case:
Multiple writ petitions challenging government resolutions regarding teachers' transfers and postings citing violation of rights under statutory provisions were submitted by teachers and educational associations. (Paras 1-5)

Findings of Court:
The Court dismissed the challenges to the G.R.-2024, ruling that the policies do not violate any statutory provisions or fundamental rights of teachers, while aiming to maintain educational standards. (Paras 34)

Issues: The case examined whether the G.R. regarding teacher transfers complied with statutory provisions and if the Zilla Parishads possessed the authority to delegate statutory functions. (Paras 5, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that executive instructions cannot supersede statutory provisions but may operate within their confines, and the administrative discretion must ensure quality education is not compromised. (Paras 22, 34)

Result: All petitions, including contempt petitions, dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ.

1. This batch of writ petitions, interim applications and contempt petition were listed for hearing on different dates. Mr. S. S. Pakale, Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam and Mr. Girish Godbole, the learned senior counsels made elaborate arguments and their submissions have been recorded by the Court in the order-sheets drawn between 30th July 2025 to 14th August 2025. The learned counsels appearing in the writ petitions vide Writ Petition No.8239 of 2025 (filed by twelve primary teachers); Writ Petition No.8753 of 2024 (filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Prathamik Shikshak Sangh with three Headmasters); Writ Petition No.9977 of 2025 (filed by nineteen primary teachers); Writ Petition No.10213 of 2025 (filed by twenty-six primary teachers, graduate teachers and Headmasters); Writ Petition No.10497 of 2025 (filed by four primary teachers); Writ Petition (ST) No.16603 of 2025 [filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Graduate Primary Teachers and Kendra Pramukh (Cluster head) Association]; Writ Petition No.10321 of 2025 (filed by sixteen assistant teachers and a primary teacher); Writ Petition No.13145 of 2025 (filed by one hundred ninety-three graduate and under graduate teachers); Writ Petition No.5759 of 2025 (filed by three hundred seventy-one graduate teachers); Writ Petition No.10470 of 2025 (filed by fifteen graduate teachers) and Writ Petition No.6213 of 2025 (filed by one hundred twenty-two graduate teachers) adopted the arguments made by Mr. S. S. Pakale, the learned senior counsel and no other submission was made in these writ petitions as regards the other prayers made by them.

2. Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition (ST) No.13145 of 2025, Writ Petition Nos.5759 of 2025 and 10321 of 2025 adopted the arguments advanced by Mr. S. S. Pakale, the learned senior counsel and relied on the judgments in “Rajneesh Kumar Pandey[Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.: (2021) 17 SCC 1 ]” and “Avinash Mehrotra”[Avinash Mehrotra v. Union of India & Ors. (2009) 6 SCC 398 ]. In Writ Petition Nos. 6028 of 2025 and 10470 of 2025, the primary challenge is to the G.R.-2024 and similar arguments are raised to challenge the said G.R. Ms. Preeti Walimbe, the learned counsel who appeared in Writ Petition No.9276 of 2025 which relates to intra-district transfer process and the learned counsels appearing in Writ Petition No.8754 of 2025 and Writ Petition (ST) No. 24468 of 2025 and the interim applications vide Inerim Application (ST) Nos. 21996 of 2025, 20158 of 2025 and the Interim Application Nos.10267 of 2025, 24313 of 2025 and 25647 of 2025 made their respective submissions emphasizing a need for taking a humanitarian approach while effecting trasnfer of the teachers. Contempt Petition No.412 of 2025 has been filed alleging wilful and intentional disobedience of the interim order passed by this Court on 6th May 2025 in Writ Petition No.16368 of 2024. This Contempt Petition has been filed by thirty-nine primary teachers who are seeking a direction to the respondent-Authorities to follow the oldstaffing pattern for the intra-district transfer of teachers.

WRIT PETITION NOS.5456 OF 2025, 6028 OF 2025 and 10470 OF2025:

3. Writ Petition No. 5456 of 2025 has been filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Padvidhar Prathamik Shikshak Va Kendrapramukh Sabha through its Chairman, namely, Girish Vijaykumar Jadhav and twenty-nine graduateteachers who are employed in upper primary schools under the Solapur Zilla Parishad. These petitioners seek to challenge the transfer and posting exercise undertaken by the Solapur Zilla Parishad as a consequence of which the petitioner nos.2 to 30 may be reverted to the post of assistant teacher in different schools. According to the petitioners, the proposed transfer and posting exercise undertaken by the Solapur Zilla Parishad would violate their statutory rights under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top