2024 Supreme(Cal) 480
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
JAY SENGUPTA, J.
Prashant Gupta – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
WPA 22092 of 2023
Decided On : 14-03-2024
For the Petitioner: Mr. Suddhasatta Banerjee, Mr. Swapan Nath, Mr Asif Hossain.
For the Respondents: Mr. Asish Kumar Guha, Mr. Anirban Dutta, Mr. Anindya Bose, Mr. Soumya Sankar Chini, Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee, Mr. Aziz Amin.
The right to electricity supply and the right to carry on a business without interference unless sanctioned by law are fundamental rights protected under the Constitution of India.
Headnote:
Electricity and Water Connection - Property Dispute - Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 144(2), Article 21, Article 19(1)(g) - Abhimanyu Mazumdar vs. The Superintendent Engineer and Another (AIR 2011 Cal 64 (FB)), Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons (J) and Another vs. State of West Bengal & Others (WPA No. 29165 of 2022, decided on 17.10.2023)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner purchased a property and faced a dispute with the association of residents regarding the use of the property for running an office. The association disconnected water and electricity services, prompting the petitioner to approach the Executive Magistrate under Section 144(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the association had no right to disconnect the essential services and that the petitioner could not be deprived of electricity and water supply, especially considering the sanctioned plan permitting a change of user for the property.
Issues: Dispute over property use, disconnection of essential services, challenge to sale deed and altered plan, and the petitioner's right to occupy the space.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of Article 21 and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, emphasizing the right to electricity supply and the right to carry on a business without interference unless sanctioned by law.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent association to restore the electricity and water supplies to the petitioner's portion of the premises, pending the final decision on the sale deed and the altered plan by the Civil Court and/or the Tribunal.
JUDGMENT :
Jay Sengupta, J.
This is an application inter alia, praying for direction upon the respondent police authorities to act in compliance with an order dated 26.07.2023 passed by an Executive Magistrate, 2nd Court at Alipore in a proceeding under Section 144(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and for ensuring that respondent nos. 6 to 9 forthwith restore the essential services i.e., electricity and water connections at the premises in question.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner has purchased the property in question from the erstwhile promoter/developer of the property but the association of residents started raising dispute as if, the property was a portion of the parking space and could not be utilized for running an office. Earlier water and electricity connection had been provided. However, subsequently the private respondents/members and staff of the building association disconnected those essential services. This prompted the petitioner to approach the Executive Magistrate under Section 144(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A favourable order was granted directing the police authorities to ensure that the petitioner gets the essential services. However, the private respondents had been unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and depriving him of his fundamental rights to get water and electricity services. In fact, there was a change approved in the sanctioned plan of the Corporation to that effect, which has been challenged by the association. But, there is no stay on the conversion/alteration in the plan. A Civil Suit filed by the respondent association challenging the sale deed is also pending before a Civil Court and there is only an order of status quo granted there. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in Abhimanyu Mazumdar vs. The Superintendent Engineer and Another reported at AIR 2011 Cal 64 (FB). There this Court decided that right to have electricity supply comes within the sweep of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Moreover, an owners’ association cannot do acts contrary to individuals’ rights as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. For instance, a right to carry on a business cannot be interfered that unless sanctioned by law. On this reliance is placed on an unreported decision of this Court in Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons (J) and Another vs. State of West Bengal & Others decided on 17.10.2023 in WPA No. 29165 of 2022.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the report filed earlier and submits as follows. An investigation was done on the FIR lodged against the members and staff of the association for disconnecting essential services. A charge-sheet has been filed in the same. It appears from the report of the police dated 15.09.2023 that during investigation the erstwhile promoter/developer confirmed that they executed the deed no. 190105767 of 2015 in the name of Prasant Gupta and he paid maintenance and electrical charges. The association had no right to disconnect electricity and water connection of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 11 submits as follows. The respondent no. 11 was the developer of the property who had sold the said property to the petitioner. The revised plan for having an office at the said place was sanctioned by the Corporation. The association subsequently challenged it before the Tribunal and the same is pending.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the C.E.S.C. Limited submits as follows. As per agreement with the association, a high tension electricity connection was given to the said association. This cannot be altered into a low tension one. Therefore, it would be for the association to supply electricity to the individual consumers inside the complex and to issue bills to them.
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 6 to 10 submits as follows. The association has alre