SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2182

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Balkar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pundir, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral) - The petitioner is impugning the order dated 28.02.2022 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar vide which his appeal preferred against the order dated 19.01.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, for grant of interim relief, by ordering the restoration of electricity connection in his shop, was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from patent illegality and being violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner, deserves to be set aside. He submits that the Courts below while passing the impugned orders failed to appreciate that the petitioner was in possession of the suit property and since electricity is a basic amenity, he could not be deprived of the same. He further contends that the electricity connection was disconnected by respondent No.1 with an ulterior motive so as to force the petitioner to vacate the suit property. He still further contends that the malafides on the part of respondent No.1 are writ large from the fact that he had filed a suit for seeking possession of the suit proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top