SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Chandana Paramanik – Appellant
Versus
Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhendu Samanta, J.
1. The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 19th September, 2015 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track, 2nd Court, Burdwan in MAC Case No. 76 of 2013.
2. The brief facts of the case is that the present appellants being the claimants have preferred an application before the learned tribunal under Section 166 of the M.V. Act for getting compensation on the ground that their predecessor was died in a road traffic accident due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle duly insured under the policy of the Insurance Company. The claim case was contested by the owner of the offending vehicle by filling written statement; subsequently, he did not contest the matter further. The Insurance Company also contested the matter by filing written statement.
3. After hearing the parties and after receiving the evidences the learned tribunal has dismissed the claim case. Only on the ground that the alleged offending vehicle was not involved in the alleged accident.
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order of dismissal the present appeal h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.