SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 850

SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Rinku Singh – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Krishanu Banik.
For the Respondent: Rajesh Singh.

JUDGMENT :

SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.

In Ref: CAN 4 of 2023

1. This is an application for amendment in respect of name and address of the appellants and also for recording the death of appellant No. 4. Heard the learned advocate, perused. The application being CAN 4 of 2023 is disposed of with a direction that the name and address of minor appellant No. 2 of the instant appeal be amended according to the table of paragraph 2 of the said application. The name of appellant No. 4 be struck out from the memo of the appeal as she has expired during the pendency of the appeal and the present appellants are the surviving legal heirs of the deceased.

2. The office is directed to carry out the said amendment within a fortnight.

3. The instant appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 15th day of September, 2010 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 3rd court, Paschim Medinipur in MAC Case No. 356 of 2006 under Section 166 of the M.V. Act.

4. The brief fact of the case is that the present appellants being the claimants preferred an application under Section 166 of the M.V

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top