SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 584

HARISH TANDON, SOUMEN SEN, KAUSIK CHANDA
Utpal Kanti Karan – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sridhar Chandra Bagari, Biswarup Biswas, Gora Chand Samanta, N.I. Khan, Amlan Kumar Mukherjee, Anirban Ray, Himadri Sekhar Chakraborty, Sucharita Paul, Swapan Kumar Dutta, Dipankar Dasgupta, Samaresh Chandra Dhara, Mahananda Roy, Lina Majumder, Supriyo Chattopadhyay, Kamalesh Bhattacharyya, Surendra Kumar Sharma, Piush Chaturvedi.
For the Respondents: Subir Sanyal, Sakti Pada Jana, Dwarik Nath Mukherjee, Kamal Mishra, Subhajyoti Das, Tarun Kumar Das, S.N. Mookerji, Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Tapas Kumar Mukherjee, Supriya Chattopadhyay, Iti Dutta, Pinaki Dhole, Arjun Roy Mukherjee, Biswajit De, Rajlakshmi Ghatak, Debdooti Dutta, Saheli Mukherjee, Kakali Smajpaty, Paritosh Sinha, Lina Majumdar, Pampa Das, Somnath Naskar.

Judgement Key Points

Please provide the full legal document (including the {content} placeholder replaced with actual text) and your specific query or task (e.g., summarize key points, analyze clauses, etc.). I'll process it accordingly using the specified reference format, such as (!) for individual pages or sections.


JUDGMENT :

SOUMEN SEN, J.

1. The present reference is arising out of an order dated 22nd August, 2008 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Smt. Rinku Sarkar vs. State of West Bengal and Others, WP No. 12414(W) of 2008, Srijit Pal vs. State of West Bengal and Others, WP No. 12419(W) of 2008 and Subimal Sinha vs. State of West Bengal and Others, WP No. 12420(W) of 2008.

2. The Division Bench upon noticing conflict between the views expressed in two earlier coordinate bench decisions in Tarak Chandra Roy vs. State of West Bengal and Others, 2008 (2) CHN 973 (in short ‘Tarak’) and the State of West Bengal and Others vs. Sauvik Ghosh and Others, 2008 (1) CLJ (Cal) 810 (in short ‘Sauvik’) formulated the following questions for consideration by the larger Bench:

    (a) Whether in view of the fact that acquisition of higher qualification or qualifications during the service career of an individual is his right and the same acts as an incentive to career advancement as well as acquiring a higher status of academic brilliance, can such a person be forced to stagnate on a lower status perennially and forced to continue to work on a lower scale of pay which is not commensurate to the higher

                                                                                                                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                                                                    1
                                                                                                                    2
                                                                                                                    3
                                                                                                                    4
                                                                                                                    5
                                                                                                                    6
                                                                                                                    7
                                                                                                                    8
                                                                                                                    9
                                                                                                                    10
                                                                                                                    11
                                                                                                                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                                                                    supreme today icon
                                                                                                                    logo-black

                                                                                                                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                                                                    Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                                                                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                                                                    qr

                                                                                                                    Scan Me!

                                                                                                                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                                                                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                                                                    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                                                                                                    whatsapp-icon Back to top