RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Satyanarayan Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.
1. The petitioner was an employee of Calcutta State Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “said Corporation”). The petitioner was superannuated on 31st August, 2017.
2. It is the petitioner’s case that the (Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regulations, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Regulation) which came into force with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1984 is applicable to the employees of the said Corporation. The petitioner contends that in terms of the said Regulation, which was subsequently amended in the year 2002, whereby the time to exercise the option was extended till 4th June, 2002. The petitioner had duly exercised the option and had opted for pension cum gratuity and had relinquished his claim to the employer’s contribution to his contributory provident fund account. It is the petitioner’s case that notwithstanding exercising such option pension was not disbursed in favour of the petitioner in terms of the said Regulation. In such circumstances, the petitioner had made a representation for release of his monthly pension. Since, his representation was not adhered to, the petitioner had filed the instant writ
The obligation of the Corporation to disburse pension upon the employee's retirement and exercise of option under the 1990 Regulations, and the rightful claim of the employee under the 1990 Regulatio....
The court affirmed the employee's right to receive pension under the 1990 Regulations and emphasized the Corporation's obligation to disburse the pension once the employee had exercised the option.
The recognized right of an employee to receive pension immediately after retirement and the obligation of the Corporation to give effect to the employee's option under the (Death-cum-Retirement) Bene....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation is obligated to disburse pension to employees who have exercised their option under the (Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regulat....
The main legal point established is the obligation of the Corporation to disburse pension in accordance with the employee's option exercised under the (Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regulations, 1990....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation is obligated to disburse pension to employees who have exercised the option under the (Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regula....
The judgment establishes the principle that once an employee exercises the option under the Regulation, it becomes the duty of the Corporation to disburse the pension, and technical objections raised....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once an employee exercises an option in accordance with the applicable regulations, the employer is obligated to give effect to the option and....
The Corporation is obligated to disburse pension in accordance with the employee's option under the (Death-cum-Retirement) Benefit Regulations, 1990, and cannot use technical objections to defeat the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation cannot use financial burden as a ground for refusal to grant pensionary benefits, and that the Corporation's failure to implem....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.