IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J.
Smt. Mousumi Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal & Anr. – Respondents
CRR 1761 of 2019
Decided on : 27-02-2024
Breach of Peace - Criminal Procedure - Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was directed to furnish a bond for maintaining peace for a period of six months under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, due to a dispute with the opposite party. The petitioner challenged this order through a revision application.
Finding of the Court:
The court affirmed the order of the Special Executive Magistrate, stating that there was a likelihood of the petitioner committing a breach of peace, and the order was legal and justified.
Issues: Dispute leading to potential breach of peace, legality of the order under Section 107 of Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the nature of Section 107 of Cr.P.C. is preventive and not punitive, aiming to ensure public tranquility and prevent breach of peace. The court also emphasized the importance of well-reasoned orders in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The revisional application was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to furnish the bond as per the order of the Special Executive Magistrate.
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision has been preferred against an order dated 05.04.2019 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge, Fast Track (3rd Court) at Barrackpore, in connection with Criminal Revision Case No. 214 of 2017, arising out of order dated 03.05.17, passed by the Court of Learned Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate, in connection with N.G.R. Case No. 1554 of 2016 initiated under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. The petitioner’s case is that on 13.01.16, one Bimala Dey i.e. opposite Party no. 2 lodged a General Diary at Dum Dum Police Station, being General Diary Entry No. 1237 dated 13.01.2016, stating that the petitioner, her husband namely Ajay Roy along with their daughter namely Madhumita Roy, threatened her and used slang language over the issue of previous grudge. After making entry of the general diary being General Diary Entry No. 1237, on 14.01.16 the A.S.I. namely B. Prasad along with force and lady constable left for enquiry and upon enquiry the police personals were of the conclusion that the petitioner, her husband and her daughter tried to assault the complainant i.e. opposite party no. 2 herein and used filthy language and that there was every chance of serious breach of peace in future over the above noted issue and thus the same was reported before the Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate, after lodging a suo moto Enquiry General Diary Entry No. 1346 dated 14.01.16.
3. On the basis of the police report a proceeding being N.G.R. Case no. 1554 of 2016 under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was initiated before the Court of the Learned Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate and by an order dated 04.05.16, the petitioner and two others were directed to show cause as to why they shall not be directed to execute bond of Rs. 1000/- each with one surety of like amount for maintaining peace for a period of six months.
4. The petitioner and two others appeared and submitted show cause on 25.05.16. On perusal of the records, i.e. complaint letter, police report, show cause petition, evidence and the arguments advanced by the Learned advocates of both the parties, Learned Special Executive Magistrate directed the petitioners to furnish a bond of Rs. 1000/- each with one surety of like amount for maintaining peace for a period of six months and discharged two others namely Ajay Ray and Madhumita Ray by an order dated 03.05.2017.
5. Being aggrieved by the order dated 03.05.2017, passed by the Learned Special Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore Police Commissionerate, an appeal in the form of Criminal Revision No. 214 of 2017, was filed under Section 373(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the Court of Learned Additional Session Judge, Fast Track (3rd Court) at Barrackpore.
6. The Learned Additional Session Judge, Fast Track (3rd Court) at Barrackpore, while passing the order dated 05.04.19 held:-
“that there lies a dispute in between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and entering the dispute there and as such is likelihood of committing breach of peace by the petitioner and as such order passed by the Magistrate, is legal and justified and does not warrant any interference”.
7. And thus vide order dated 05.04.19 affirmed the order dated 03.05.17 passed in proceeding NGR case no. 1554 of 2016 under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, passed by the Learned Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore directing the appellant to furnish bond for keeping peace for a period of six months and thereby dismissed the Criminal Revision No. 214 of 2017.
8. The proceedings in this case is under Section 107 Cr.P.C.
9. Section 107 of Cr.P.C., lays down:-
“107. Security for keeping the peace in other cases.-
(1) When an Executive Magistrate receives information that any person is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquillity or t
AI
Section 107 of Cr.P.C. is preventive in nature, aiming to ensure public tranquility and prevent breach of peace.
The necessity for the magistrate to provide concrete evidence of a threat to peace before issuing orders under Section 107 of the CrPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of the procedural requirements under Section 107 and 111 of Cr.P.C., emphasizing the need for a full-fledged judicial enquiry ....
The Magistrate's failure to include substantive information in peace bond orders violates statutory mandates, necessitating procedural compliance to uphold public order.
A preliminary order under Section 107 requires clear evidence of imminent threat to public peace, not merely past criminal involvement.
Invocation of Section 107 requires the Executive Magistrate's satisfaction of specific grounds for potential breach of peace, which was not met in this case.
Executive Magistrates must provide substantive information in orders for peace bonds as per BNSS sections 126 and 130.
An Executive Magistrate can initiate proceedings under S. 107 Cr.P.C. without a prior incident if there is a likelihood of a breach of peace.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.