2024 Supreme(Cal) 742
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
T.S. Sivagnanam, Supratim Bhattacharya, JJ.
Pradip Kumar Jaiswal - Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Howrah and Kadamtala Charge & Ors. – Respondents
M.A.T. 212 of 2023 With I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Decided On : 30-01-2024
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Swapnesh Mallik
For the Respondent: Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. GP Mr. T.M. Siddique Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. S. Sanyal
The importance of adjudicating the matter on merits and in accordance with law, and granting the appellant an opportunity to submit a reply to the show-cause notice.
Headnote:
W.B.G.S.T. Act - Adjudication Order - The court granted the appellant an opportunity to submit a reply to the show-cause notice and directed the adjudicating authority to pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant's writ petition challenging an adjudication order passed under Section 74 of the W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 was dismissed on the ground of delay in approaching the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant had not challenged the adjudication order immediately, resulting in a garnishee notice being issued by the department. The court granted the appellant an opportunity to submit a reply to the show-cause notice and directed the adjudicating authority to pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law.
Issues: Delay in approaching the court, challenge to adjudication order, opportunity to submit reply to show-cause notice
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and granted the appellant an opportunity to submit a reply to the show-cause notice, emphasizing the importance of adjudicating the matter on merits and in accordance with law.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of by setting aside the order passed in the writ petition with a direction to the appellant to submit his reply to the show-cause notice within a specified period. The adjudicating authority was directed to pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law. The appellant was granted liberty to file an application for lifting of the bank attachment before the adjudicating authority.
JUDGMENT :
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.
1. This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 8th December, 2022 in W.P.A. 26225 of 2022 by which the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging an adjudication order passed under Section 74 of the W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 dated 29th March, 2022 was dismissed on the ground that the appellant had approached the learned writ court belatedly.
2. As could be seen from the material papers annexed in the stay petition, though notices were served on the appellant under Section 151(2) of the Act dated 11th May, 2021 and 19th may, 2021, summoning the appellant to give evidence in connection with the enquiry to be conducted, it is stated that the appellant in response to the summons produce certain documents. Subsequently show-cause notice dated 25th February, 2022 was issued and the appellant was called upon to submit his reply. Since the appellant did not submit his reply, an order was passed on 29th March, 2022 in which a demand has been raised. The said order was not put to challenge immediately, which resulted in a garnishee notice being issued by the department. At that stage, the writ petition was filed.
3. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that one more opportunity can be granted to the appellant to submit his reply to the show-cause notice dated 25th February, 2022 so that the adjudicating authority can pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.
4. Accordingly, the appeal along with connected application (I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023) stand disposed of by setting aside the order passed in the writ petition with a direction to the appellant to submit his reply to the show-cause notice dated 25th February, 2022 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of server copy of this order.
5. On receipt of the reply, the adjudicating authority shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the appellant or his authorised representative and pass a reasoned order on merits and in accordance with law.
6. The appellant is granted liberty to file an application for lifting of the bank attachment before the adjudicating authority, which shall also be decided in accordance with law.
7. No costs.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.
Supratim Bhattacharya, J.- I agree.