IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.
Dr. Arup Kumar Bhaumik – Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A. No. 5633 of 2020
Decided On : 16-02-2024
Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - Constitution of India - Article 226 - [RCCIIT] - [Constitution of India, Article 226] - [Section 12 of Constitution of India, Article 226] - [The instant writ petition challenges the termination of the petitioner's service as principal on probation of the college. The court analyzed the maintainability of the writ petition against RCCIIT, a self-financed engineering college, and discussed the control and funding aspects. The court referred to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in St. Mary’s Education Society & Anr. and held that RCCIIT, though performing public duty by imparting education, did not involve a public element in the decision under challenge, making the writ petition not maintainable.]
Fact of the Case:
The writ petition challenges the termination of the petitioner's service as principal on probation of the college.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petition was not maintainable as the decision under challenge did not involve a public element, as per the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in St. Mary’s Education Society & Anr.
Issues: The main issue was the maintainability of the writ petition against RCCIIT, a self-financed engineering college, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that RCCIIT, though performing public duty by imparting education, did not involve a public element in the decision under challenge, making the writ petition not maintainable.
Final Decision: The court held that the writ petition was not maintainable and referred the matter to the Hon’ble Chief Justice for resolution of the issue.
JUDGMENT :
Subhendu Samanta, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the writ petitioner challenging an order dated 01.06.2020 issued by the Chairman of Board of Governors of respondent college namely RCCIIT Institute of Information Technology (RCCIIT), terminating the service of the petitioner as principal on probation of the college, pursuant to the decision taken at the meeting of the Board of Governors dated 29.05.2020.
2. During the final hearing of the instant writ petition the respondent No. 7 and 8 raised point of maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that RCCIIT is not not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
3. This Court think it necessary to hear the point of maintainability before entering into the merit. Accordingly, the point of maintainability of this writ petition is heard on behalf of the parties.
4. Learned Advocate Mr. Saptansu Basu submits that RCCIIT is self financed engineering college which is established under an autonomous society. The affairs of the college was managed and controlled by Governing Body with the nomencletcher “Board of Governors”. The members of Governing Body of the college are selected by the Board of Management of the Society and are not nominated by the government of West Bengal. Mr. Basu Further argued the service conditions of the employees of the college are governed by the service rules of the college. The service rules of the college having not been framed in pursuance to in delegated powers of the State and hence the same do not have any statutory force. The service rules of the college simply defined the service contract between the employer and its employees and the same is solely within the private law domain.
5. Employees of the college are not recruited or recommended by the West Bengal College Service Commission. Such persons are recruited through the advertisement by the college in newspapers and recommended by the screening committee on the basis of their performances by interview.
6. Mr. Basu further argued that the college dose not receive any recurring grounds from the State Government. The State Government does not pay the salary of the stuff of the college or any component of such amount payable, from its own exchequer. The college bears the burden of paying the salary of its stuff from its own funds, especially from the tuition fees collected from the students. Mr. Basu further argued the State Government does not exercise deep and all pervasive control over the administrative, financial and functional aspect of the college.
7. On the basis of that argument Mr. Basu, argued that the respondent college is not “stafe” within the meaning of Section 12 of Constitution of India and hence, it is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. Mr. Basu, further argued that the AICE by its notification No. F. No. 37-3/Legal dated 10.12.2010 defined Government aided institutions to mean, a technical institution that meets 50% or more of its recurring expenditure out of the ground received from the Government or Government Organisations. In terms of the said notification the respondent college does not qualified to be a Government aided institutions. Finally he argued the instant writ petition is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed in limini.
8. In support of his contention he cited a decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in St. Mary’s Education Society & Anr. Vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and Ors. (2023) 4 SCC 498.
9. Mr. Ranajeet Chatterjee, Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the point of maintainability has already been decided by two Co-ordinate Benches of this court. He argued that the Hon’ble Co-ordinate Bench in WP No. 13874 (w) of 2016 categorically analysed the issued regarding the point of maintainability. The Co-ordinate Bench has took note about the formation and power of Governing Body of RCCIIT and also has perused the formations and procedure of appointment of Board of Management of RCCIIT.
10. Learn
St. Mary’s Education Society & Anr. Vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and Ors.
Writ jurisdiction does not extend to private institutions unless they perform public functions; employment disputes in such institutions are governed by private contracts.
Matter pertains to the internal affairs of an unaided Non-Government Educational Institution, a writ petition would not be maintainable against the unaided private Institution, as an alternative reme....
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply to private employment disputes.
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against a private unaided minority educational institution. A service dispute in the private realm involving a priva....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.