RAMESH SINHA, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Devesh Verma – Appellant
Versus
Christ Church College Throu Principal Hazratganj Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Order on C.M.An.782 of 2018 (Application for Condonation of delay): -
1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal.
2. We have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the application.
3. The cause shown for the delay is sufficient.
4. The application is allowed.
5. Delay in filing appeal is hereby condoned.
Order On the Special Appeal
1. By means of the instant intra court appeal, the appellant-petitioner has sought to challenge the judgment and order dated 12.09.2017 passed by an Hon'ble Single Judge dismissing Writ Petition No. 6630 (S/S) of 1996, which was filed by the appellant challenging his removal from a post of Lecturer in Christ Church College, Lucknow (which will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the college’), on the ground that the removal was done in violation of Section 16 G (3) of the U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant had filed the Writ Petition pleading that he had been duly selected and was appointed as a Lecturer in Physics in the College and he had joined his duties on 07.10.1991. On 31.03.1992, the Principal of the College had lodged a First Information report
Abu Zaid and Ors. vs. Principal, Madrasa-Tul-Islah Saraimir
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd.
Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. N.R. Vairamani
Committee of Management, St. John's Inter College v. Girdhari Singh & Ors
Committee of Management, St. John Inter College v. Girdhari Singh
Marwari Balika Vidyalaya v. Asha Srivastava
Satimbla Sharma v. St Paul’s Senior Secondary School
Sandeep Chauhan and Ors. Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Ors. 2001 (2) LBESR 644
Harold James versus Union of India
Marwari Balika Vidyalaya v. Asha Srivastava, (2020) 14 SCC 449
Sandeep Chauhan and Ors. Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Ors. 2001 (2) LBESR 644
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against a private unaided minority educational institution. A service dispute in the private realm involving a priva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a service dispute involving a private educational institution and its employee is not amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitut....
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply to private employment disputes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against a private unaided minority institution for service dis....
Matter pertains to the internal affairs of an unaided Non-Government Educational Institution, a writ petition would not be maintainable against the unaided private Institution, as an alternative reme....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.